Troll below took a lame pot shot
But really you shouldn't embarrass yourself quite so badly...the document you are "laughing about" is labelled with it's source, so obviously you didn't really look. the source is here for your convenience and embarrassment
Its from the US National library of Medicine. Hah! What a joker your are. Pretending that the USNLIM was actually my work, and then taking pot shot at it. Well you didn't actual even muster a pot shot, all you did was say you laughed.
My assumptions in my work were fairly simple, I took a rectangular box that encompassed known EPA published data points, took an independent simulation of particulate spread, then made it smaller to be conservative, and then assumed a uniform distribution within the volume. Assumptions were clearly stated, backed up with charts and models, and conservative.
The only way that much uranium was in the EPA filters was a massive launch and aerosolization of core or fuel pool material or both. A little temporary even 3 day fire wouldn't do it.
Contrary to what you said I did not make assumption about dispersion of various isotopes, as I simplifed and made my estimates more conservative by only using the most common isotope U-238.
So again, just another pot shot from you. Is that the best you can do, seriously? If i was paying you to be a troll I would fire you.
You could reduce my estimates by 87% AND the only logical conclusion would still be a launch of 10's of tons of uranium.
Here is my original source material for those interested in the truth.
I have also documented your inability to actual mount an argument as an example in the blog.