Here is his report:
After my analysis of his results, about all I could do was post this at ENENEWS:
OK I am a bit freaked out about this
I have been analyzing MVBs gamma spec on rain water.
I have been trying to wrap my brain around it and create an article, but I am just flipping around like a boneless chicken.
What he found was 33,450 Bq per M3 water. Of substances that could be of natural origin (but supplemented by fission)that would be 45%.
So 55% or more is from man-made radiation. But only the gamma sources were detected, so isotopes that emit only in beta, such as strontium, tritium, plutonium 241 are not even part of the report.
There is a large presence of Americium 241, it 6 percent of radiation. But that has a super long half life 3.8 million hours, so it doesn't emit that often, so there is A LOT of it.
Americium 241 comes from a beta decay of Plutonium 241. So the plutonium was not detected because its beta decay. And there is A LOT of Americium. But PU 241 has a half life of 14 years, and Fukushima blew up 4 years ago, so not even 1/3 of 1/2 has transformed into Americium. But there is A LOT of Americium.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So there is way more Plutonium
stock out--article will come later
I have made a spreadsheet that replicated some of the lab data. I wanted also to figure out what might be naturally occurring.
I had previously analyzed the data for the CS134 to CS137 ratio which can function as a time stamp to see if they were from a recent release. The Cs was actually in pretty low proportions and the data showed more Cs 134 than Cs137 so there was no "proof" as to whether it was a recent release.
Here is a screen cap of the spreadsheet
If you want to learn more about Gamma Spectrometry, this is a great book that is an online resource
stock: Not sure, combination of factors.MVB was worried that because no individual result could be guaranteed by a radiation lab to be "correct" that we had to accept that none of the data was correct. I provided a "duck theory" response in the comment section and then elaborated on my train of thought in the screen capture of spreadsheet.
Continued fallout of uranium (as well as airborne uranium/radium decay schemes), plutonium, and Americium from Fuku prompt criticality "canon blasts" as well on ongoing fresh emissions carried by jet stream.
Fallout especially concentrated during cloud to cloud lighting discharges.
One can see that even if you only had 5 samples that could prove recent fission products, and you were only 68% sure about each one being correct (i.e. a 1 sigma level of confidence), then the chance that all 5 are wrong becomes vanishingly small.
|Ducks Exposed Like Lying Nukists|
IN Japan they say "we all know", good to see some truth dissemination in Japan