Please share far and wide!

Thursday, November 2, 2017

Poll -- And Surprising Results Ongoing -- You Can Vote -- Outlaw Islam in the USA?

FMR U.S. Border Patrol | New Mexico SWAT Operator | Legend Who Lives Rent Free In The Minds of Liberals World Wide.

https://twitter.com/crusher614

He put up a poll which went way beyond just border control, nation ban, or extreme vetting.

  TAKE MY SAME POLL HERE -- Voice Your Opinion



Here is a source for some modern day "Caliphate" "teachings". https://caliphate.eu/2017/06/04/london-bridge-attack-muslims-are-not-treacherous-and-they-fulfil-their-covenants/

14 comments:

  1. Would the First Amendment have to be banned first?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its not like they give a shit about any of the other amendments which are the bill of rights.

      But in reality I think the "work around" is to define that a belief system that requires the followers to kill all outside the belief system, that allows a male to rape his step daughter (or step son) regardless of age, is not actually a religion.

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

      Delete
  2. Hello, Stock. Wouldn't pass a law banning Islam, but would definitely be in favor of extreme vetting.

    Islam is a scourge on Western Civilization.

    I know many Shia and Sunni who are peaceable, but the religion does advocate killing the infidel. And cheating him.

    It does not promote a good moral standard of conduct toward others. Not like in Christianity, where God shows no partiality, and there is, "neither Jew nor Greek nor slave nor free," but all are equal in the eyes of God.
    HoTaters

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, it is a slippery slope. But I was amazed at how many people would go for a complete ban. Label it as a non-religion

      The graphic in the article is from a twitter poll with huge numbers responding, like 20,000 and 80% were for an all out ban.

      Islam also allows a man to rape his step daughter as often as he wants and regardless of age. I have a big problem with that.

      Delete
    2. Please educate yourself. You have swallowed the "divide and conquer" propaganda about Islam. Read this and become a force for truth. Beliefs divide, love unites.

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/tolerance-and-spirituality-debunking-the-islamophobic-view-of-an-intolerant-islam/5616728

      Delete
    3. My favorite source of education is to go to the source document. I am sure that 95% of all Muslims are real good people.

      Yet, your incomplete quote is more a pot shot at Jews, and perchance a shot at dividing the Jews and the Christians.

      But please comment on the authority given to men by the Quran to rape their step daughters.

      Thou wilt surely find that, of all people, the most hostile to those who believe [in this divine writ] are the Jews as well as those who are bent on ascribing divinity to aught beside God; and thou wilt surely find that, of all people, 96 they who say, "Behold, we are Christians," come closest to feeling affection for those who believe [in this divine writ]: this is so because there are priests and monks among them, and because these are not given to arrogance. 97

      Delete
    4. Which version of the Quaran are you using as your source? Surely you know that there are many versions of all the world's scriptures. How does one determine which one is authentic? How do you know what you have read about raping step daughters is actually what Mohammed said?

      Delete
    5. One example:
      After the Islamic State kidnapped and pressed into slavery thousands of Yazidi women and children in 2014, the caliphate issued an FAQ of sorts on slavery, which included rules on sexually molesting children: "It is permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn’t reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse; however, if she is not fit for intercourse, then it is enough to enjoy her without intercourse."

      Delete
    6. 004.023 Forbidden unto you are your mothers, and your daughters, and your sisters, and your father's sisters, and your mother's sisters, and your brother's daughters and your sister's daughters, and your foster-mothers, and your foster-sisters, and your mothers-in-law, and your step-daughters who are under your protection (born) of your women unto whom ye have gone in - but if ye have not gone in unto them, then it is no sin for you (to marry their daughters) - and the wives of your sons who (spring) from your own loins. And (it is forbidden unto you) that ye should have two sisters together, except what hath already happened (of that nature) in the past. Lo! Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful.
      004.024 And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.

      Delete
    7. http://www.islam101.com/quran/QTP/QTP004.htm

      Delete
    8. Your first quoted source regarding Islam is ISIS. WTF? I thought you were smarter than this. ISIS does not represent Islam and it has been thoroughly denounced by true muslims. ISIS has been killing muslims right and left!

      I've enjoyed your scientific approach to nuclear issues, but your approach to matters of spirituality is based on hearsay, propaganda, and ignorance. It seems I am wasting my time here.

      Delete
    9. I don't back down from an argument. You pick at my first reference, and ignore the second reference, which is a quote from the Quran

      This is not based on hearsay, propaganda, and ignorance. Try this next one...."it's OK to take the wife of a Christian as your own wife because by definition their marriage was a fake marriage.

      O ye who believe! When believing women come unto you as fugitives, examine them. Allah is Best Aware of their faith. Then, if ye know them for true believers, send them not back unto the disbelievers. They are not lawful for them (the disbelievers), nor are they (the disbelievers) lawful for them. And give them (the disbelievers) that which they have spent (upon them). And it is no sin for you to marry such women when ye have given them their dues. And hold not to the ties of disbelieving women; and ask for (the return of) that which ye have spent; and let them (the disbelievers) ask for that which they have spent. That is the judgment of Allah. He judgeth between you. Allah is Knower, Wise.

      Delete
  3. But the "neither Jew nor Greek nor slave nor free" applies to believers in Christ. However, in a Christian-based society, others are not viewed as less, because every human being is created in the image of God.

    Allah is not a loving and ocmpassionate God. A God of vengeance, yes. So is the Abrahamic God. But the Judeo Christian God has the attributes of omniscience, omnipresence, wisdom, is perfectly good, perfectly loving, AND perfectly just.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hmmmm but Jewish and Christian are spin offs of Abrahamic.

      http://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/KJV.htm

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments