stock here: the harder they smile, the more they are lying to your face……AI analysis, Looks exactly like what you would expect. The “ghost with no soul” Governor Evers of Wisconsin, was at the Brewer’s World Champion parade and Rally. He was introduced as a member of the audience, and the response was very muted, say 20% of any other introduction. Real people hate him, and good riddance. Shame on him for following the Globalist BS.

===============

Tom Tiffany vs. David Crowley: Four-Year Voting and Governing Record

Wisconsin governor’s race • November 2026 • Review period: January 2023–October 2026

The objective is to compare what Tom Tiffany (Republican) and David Crowley (Democrat) have actually done in public office, rather than relying primarily on campaign promises or political advertising.

There’s an important methodological difference:

• Tiffany has been a U.S. representative since 2020. His record includes hundreds of recorded congressional votes, allowing direct examination of how he voted on specific legislation.
• Crowley has been Milwaukee County executive since 2020. He does not cast legislative roll-call votes in that position. His record must instead be evaluated through approved budgets, signed legislation, vetoes, executive decisions, and negotiations with other elected officials.

Both previously served in the Wisconsin Legislature, but their state legislative service falls outside most of the requested four-year window. I’ll distinguish those historical votes where relevant.

1. Congressional voting pattern and executive record

Tom Tiffany

99%

Voted with the majority of House Republicans on 450 of 455 party-dividing votes in the 119th Congress, through September 16, 2026.

David Crowley

Executive record

No comparable congressional voting percentage. County budgets, tax decisions, administrative actions, and signed or vetoed measures are the evidence.

A separate analysis found Tiffany voted in accordance with President Trump’s publicly stated position on 133 of 134 applicable House votes during that same period. This describes legislative alignment, not a measure of legislative effectiveness. Capitol Lens+1

2. Side-by-side comparison on major voter issues

In Marquette Law School’s September 2026 polling, 45% of Wisconsin voters identified inflation and the cost of living as the most important election issue. Health insurance was also a prominent concern. wisconsinwatch.org+1

In the table below, Vote means a recorded legislative vote; Action means a documented executive decision; and Position means a publicly stated policy preference, not an enacted measure.

Issue	Tom Tiffany — Republican	David Crowley — Democrat
Taxes and government spending	Vote: Supported the July 2025 federal tax-and-spending law, including extension of tax cuts and changes to federal benefit programs. Position: Proposes longer-term Wisconsin income and property-tax reductions. clerk.house.gov+1	Action: Helped negotiate Act 12 and signed a county sales-tax increase from 0.5% to 0.9% in 2023. Signed a 2024 budget reducing the property-tax levy by $21 million, followed by budgets increasing that levy. wisconsinwatch.org+2
Health care and Medicaid	Vote: Supported the 2025 law introducing new Medicaid eligibility and work requirements. Position: Advocates hospital price transparency, direct primary care, and pharmacy-benefit-manager oversight. clerk.house.gov+1	Action: Approved county budgets funding mental-health and related services. Position: Proposes allowing more households to buy into BadgerCare, with income-based premiums. county.milwaukee.gov+1
Immigration and border security	Votes: Supported the 2023 Secure the Border Act and 2025 Laken Riley Act. Position: Wants broader cooperation between state/local law enforcement and ICE. clerk.house.gov+2	Position/executive practice: Opposes local police participation in ICE detainer arrangements; supports deportation of undocumented immigrants convicted of violent crimes. wisconsinwatch.org+1
Police and criminal justice	Votes: Supported federal enforcement and immigration-related detention measures. Several campaign claims that he voted to defund police were found inaccurate; one vote, however, opposed a local-police funding bill. wisconsinwatch.org+1	Action: Signed the 2025 budget with $13 million more in tax-levy funding for the sheriff, correctional facility, and courts. Also supports diversion and reintegration programs. county.milwaukee.gov+1
Public schools and vouchers	Vote: Supported the 2023 Parents Bill of Rights Act. Position: Supports private-school choice and is open to raising voucher income limits. clerk.house.gov+1	Position: Supports additional public-school funding, but says he would retain existing school-voucher programs rather than abruptly end them. No county executive vote on statewide school funding. wisconsinwatch.org
Abortion	Sponsorship: Co-sponsored the 2023 federal Heartbeat Protection Act, which would restrict abortion upon detection of fetal cardiac activity, generally around six weeks. 2026 position: Says he would preserve Wisconsin’s 20-week limit rather than sign a new heartbeat bill. and the facts+1	Position: Supports constitutional protection for abortion rights and decisions made between doctors and patients. In 2019, while in the Assembly, voted against a Republican born-alive bill. WPR+1
Elections and voting laws	Vote: Supported the 2025 SAVE Act requiring documentary proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. Previously supported challenges to the 2020 presidential election results, outside this review period. House Clerk+1	Position: Opposes restrictive voter-ID policies and favors automatic voter registration and earlier absentee-ballot processing. His automatic-registration proposal as a legislator did not pass. Wisconsin Watch
Energy, mining and environment	Record: Championed Wisconsin mining deregulation before 2023. 2026 position: Supports domestic energy development and opposes state tax subsidies for data centers. WPR+2	Action: Approved county investments in parks, trails, and other infrastructure. 2026 position: Supports environmental review of data centers and now favors repealing Wisconsin’s data-center sales-tax exemption. Milwaukee County+2
Housing, transportation and affordability	Position: Emphasizes deregulation, housing supply, tax reductions, and repeal of minimum-markup rules on gasoline. Opposes increasing transportation user fees or introducing tolls. Wisconsin Watch+1	Action: Approved county housing investments and transit support. Position: Proposes additional housing and child-care spending and is open to transportation user fees or tolls. Milwaukee County+2
Foreign policy and military action	Votes: Opposed the April 2024 Ukraine supplemental appropriations bill and March 2026 resolution directing removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran. House Clerk+1	No equivalent votes: County government has no responsibility for federal military deployments or appropriations. His campaign has criticized Tiffany’s Iran votes. wisconsinwatch.org

The columns describe different forms of public authority, not equal legislative power. An untested campaign proposal should not carry the same evidentiary weight as a signed budget or recorded vote.

3. Milwaukee County taxes: Crowley’s actual fiscal record

An important distinction is the difference between property-tax levy, sales-tax rate, and the overall tax burden. A reduction in one does not necessarily offset an increase in another for every household.

Milwaukee County property-tax levy, 2020–2025

Actual countywide levy, not the average household tax bill. Sources: Wisconsin Policy Forum figures reproduced by Wisconsin Watch.

Reported countywide levies for tax years 2020–2025. Wisconsin Watch

County sales-tax rate

0.5% → 0.9%

Increase approved in 2023 under Act 12.

2024 budget projection

$31.6M

Projected surplus when the 2024 budget was adopted, not a verified year-end surplus.

The fiscal trade-off was additional sales-tax revenue to support county services and pension obligations, together with some property-tax relief. Crowley supported that trade-off; the county board approved it and Republican state lawmakers enabled it. The property-tax reductions did not continue every year. Milwaukee County+2

4. Tiffany’s actual congressional votes — selected roll calls

These are especially useful because the House Clerk records each vote individually, rather than relying on either campaign’s characterization.

Date	Legislation and issue	Tiffany’s vote
March 24, 2023	H.R. 5 — Parents Bill of Rights Act, addressing parental access to school information	YES House Clerk
May 11, 2023	H.R. 2 — Secure the Border Act, expanding immigration enforcement and border-security requirements	YES House Clerk
April 20, 2024	H.R. 8035 — Approximately $61 billion in Ukraine-related supplemental funding	NO House Clerk
January 22, 2025	S. 5 — Laken Riley Act, expanding mandatory immigration detention in specified cases	YES House Clerk
April 10, 2025	H.R. 22 — SAVE Act, requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration	YES House Clerk
July 3, 2025	H.R. 1 — Major federal tax-and-spending legislation, including tax-cut extensions and changes to Medicaid and food assistance	YES House Clerk
November 18, 2025	H.R. 4405 — Epstein Files Transparency Act, requiring release of specified Justice Department records subject to exceptions	YES House Clerk
February 11, 2026	H.J.Res. 72 — Resolution terminating the emergency declaration underlying certain Canadian tariffs	NO House Clerk
March 5, 2026	H.Con.Res. 38 — Resolution directing removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran	NO House Clerk

An important qualification: A YES vote establishes support for the legislation as a package, not necessarily agreement with every provision. Similarly, a NO vote on the Iran resolution establishes opposition to that particular restriction; it does not, by itself, establish support for every possible military action.

Several of these measures passed the House without becoming law in that form. They remain useful evidence of voting positions, but should not be presented as enacted policies.

5. Crowley’s budget approvals — the closest executive equivalent

Budget / decision	Documented action	Additional context
2023: Act 12 and sales tax	Signed the increase in Milwaukee County sales tax from 0.5% to 0.9%.	The Legislature authorized the increase, and the County Board approved it. The revenue was intended in part to address longstanding pension and fiscal obligations. Wisconsin Watch
2024 county budget	Approved a significant property-tax levy reduction and a budget that anticipated a $31.6 million surplus.	The projected surplus was not the same as a confirmed year-end result. Investments included transportation, parks and other services. Milwaukee County
2025 county budget	Signed a budget increasing the property-tax levy by $7.2 million, or 2.5%.	Included $13 million more in tax-levy funding for the sheriff, Community Reintegration Center and courts. Milwaukee County
2026 county budget	Signed an approximately $1.3 billion budget without vetoes, addressing a projected $46 million budget gap.	Combined additional revenues, department savings, transit adjustments and funding for housing and other services. The adopted budget included service reductions as well as protected programs. Milwaukee County+1

One accounting caution: the tax-levy years in the earlier chart and the names of county fiscal-year budgets are not always identical. The 2024 budget’s property-tax reduction should not be interpreted as a reduction repeated in each subsequent year.

The other important finding is that Crowley’s administration has had to balance competing pressures. The 2026 budget illustrates this: even with higher tax collections, the county faced substantial structural and operating pressures, particularly in public transit and behavioral-health services. Milwaukee County+1

6. What the four-year records establish

Fiscal policy

Tiffany’s federal votes support extending federal tax reductions while modifying spending and eligibility rules for major assistance programs. Crowley’s county record combines a sales-tax increase, an initial substantial property-tax reduction, subsequent levy increases, and continued funding for county services.

Law enforcement and immigration

Tiffany has consistently supported more restrictive federal immigration enforcement. Crowley’s record includes increased county public-safety appropriations, alongside opposition to broader local participation in federal immigration detention arrangements. These are distinct policy decisions, not simple measures of support for law enforcement.

Health care

Tiffany voted for legislation tightening aspects of Medicaid eligibility; Crowley proposes wider access through a BadgerCare buy-in. Crowley has not previously had the power to enact that statewide proposal, and a congressional Medicaid vote does not directly determine what a Wisconsin governor could independently change.

Social and election policy

Their documented differences include abortion restrictions, voter-registration requirements, school-voucher policy, and the role of government in education. Tiffany has recent federal sponsorship or votes on several of these matters; Crowley’s recent record is largely stated positions because county government lacks jurisdiction over most of them.

7. Sources worth examining directly

For independent verification, the most useful underlying records are the U.S. House Clerk roll-call database and the Milwaukee County budget documents. The Wisconsin Watch examination of Crowley’s tax record is also useful for distinguishing sales taxes from property-tax levies.

Bottom line: The evidence shows substantial, documented differences in taxation, federal benefit programs, immigration enforcement, abortion, and voting laws. It also shows that Crowley has made identifiable executive decisions involving tax increases, tax reductions, public-safety spending, county services, and budget reductions.

The central limitation remains that this is a comparison of a federal legislator’s voting record with a county executive’s governing record, not two comparable sets of legislative votes. For judging specific claims, the recorded votes and enacted budgets provide firmer evidence than statements about what either candidate might do as governor.

stock here, I knew this story, but here it is….

really the soviets were the driving force in the Hitler loss

The military facts bear that out. While the Western Allies provided indispensable industrial power, naval dominance, and a vital second front, the Red Army broke the back of the German Wehrmacht on land.

The Numbers on the Eastern Front

The sheer scale of combat on the Eastern Front dwarfed all other European operations:

• 80% of German Military Casualties: Approximately 4 out of every 5 German combat deaths occurred fighting the Red Army.
• Massive Troop Concentration: Between 1941 and 1944, Germany deployed roughly 150 to 200 divisions on the Eastern Front at any given time, compared to roughly 15 to 30 divisions fighting Allied forces in North Africa, Italy, and pre-D-Day Western Europe.
• Tipping Point Battles: The major operational turnarounds of the European war—Stalingrad (where an entire German Field Army was surrounded and destroyed) and Kursk (the largest armored battle in human history)—were fought and won by the Soviet military well before the Allied landings at Normandy in June 1944.

The Human and Material Cost

German military map of Stalingrad. Source: ullstein bild Dtl. / ullstein bild via Getty Images

The Soviet Union bore an overwhelming human cost to achieve this victory:

Category	Estimates
Soviet Military Fatalities	~8.7 million to 11 million soldiers
Soviet Civilian Deaths	~17 million to 19 million civilians
Total Soviet Population Lost	~27 million (~14%–15% of the total pre-war USSR population)
Comparative U.S. Total Combat Deaths	~405,000 across all theaters

The Grand Strategy Reality: A Combined Effort

While the USSR was the primary land force that destroyed the Wehrmacht, WWII military strategists and historians generally view the victory as a three-way dependency:

1. Soviet Meat & Steel: The Red Army provided the overwhelming manpower and ground force necessary to grind down Germany’s armored armies and infantry.
2. U.S. Industrial Logistics (Lend-Lease): The U.S. provided the raw logistics that kept the Red Army mobile. Through Lend-Lease, America shipped over 400,000 jeeps and trucks, 14,000 aircraft, 13,000 tanks, millions of boots, and millions of tons of aviation fuel, high-grade steel, and explosive gunpowder to the USSR. Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov later noted that without American trucks and industrial material, Soviet counter-offensives would have stalled much earlier.
3. Western Air & Sea Dominance: The British and American navies won the Battle of the Atlantic to keep global supply lines open, while the Allied Combined Bomber Offensive forced Germany to redirect vast amounts of artillery, planes, and industrial production away from the Eastern Front to defend its own skies.

The Red Army acted as the principal ground engine that destroyed Hitler’s armed forces, operating within a global coalition that supplied the fuel, equipment, and multi-front air and sea pressure necessary to make that destruction possible.

stock here: yes, why now? How many are in jail?

My point is simple and it is made.

stock here: This was pushed into my feed. Good Chuckle!! Everything I have pushed into Wikipedia was removed within a day.

stock here: transcript

Testimony on Vaccine Safety, Myocarditis Risks, and Data Transparency

Table of Contents

• Chapter 1: Concerns Over Vaccine Safety
• Chapter 2: Introduction of Dr. Peter McCullough
• Chapter 3: Cardiac Risks and Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis
• Chapter 4: VAERS Data and Patient Impact
• Chapter 5: Mechanism of Harm and Evaluating Efficacy

Chapter 1: Concerns Over Vaccine Safety

Eighty percent of Americans took a COVID-19 vaccine; twenty percent did not. The vaccine was never safe enough for me to take.

Messenger RNA devised by Pfizer and Moderna was chemically modified to be resistant to the enzymes in the human body that would normally break it down. As a result, messenger RNA has been identified in the human hearts of individuals who died following vaccination, as well as in the brain. Furthermore, the spike protein is distributed throughout the body. Three independent studies now demonstrate that the spike protein circulates in the bloodstream for six to nine months post-vaccination.

In vaccinated individuals, this portion of the virus—the lethal component—remains in circulation. When individuals receive subsequent boosters, additional spike protein enters circulation. It functions as a killer protein; it cannot be considered safe, and it was unsafe by design. Safety must always trump efficacy. We cannot tolerate false drug claims. This data is established in peer-reviewed literature and does not constitute misinformation.

Chapter 2: Introduction of Dr. Peter McCullough

Chairman: Our first witness is Dr. Peter McCullough. Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist based in Dallas, Texas. He has published extensively, with over 700 citations indexed in the National Library of Medicine. He has testified on multiple occasions before the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, the European Parliament, and numerous state legislatures regarding public health policy. Dr. McCullough, welcome.

Dr. Peter McCullough: Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Blumenthal, and members of the subcommittee, it is an honor to present my insights, analysis, and clinical experience on this critical topic.

The first time I testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, before I uttered a single word, Ranking Member Senator Gary Peters stated that what the American public was about to hear was “misinformation.” I did not understand the framing at the time; I had never encountered that term used in academic medicine or high-level policy deliberations. That was on November 19, 2020.

In effect, he was employing an established political tactic to discredit my testimony before I spoke. Public officials should not seek leverage over experts coming to Washington to assist the nation on critical issues. As introduced, I am an internist and cardiologist, and I believe I am among the most published individuals to testify on COVID-19 matters in these legislative hearings.

Chapter 3: Cardiac Risks and Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis

I have examined thousands of patients, analyzed extensive dataset collections, and published extensively on this subject. As a physician and cardiologist, my professional imperative has always been to fight disease, preserve life, and above all, do no harm.

Our focus today is myocarditis—heart muscle inflammation and damage—resulting from COVID-19 vaccines. Prior to the pandemic, I had evaluated only two cases of myocarditis across my entire clinical career. Today, there are over 1,650 peer-reviewed papers documenting COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis.

Allow me to summarize key findings from the peer-reviewed literature:

1. Washington University in St. Louis (August 18, 2021): Published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Verma et al., a 42-year-old male was admitted to Washington University Hospital with vaccine-associated myocarditis. Viral infection was ruled out. Despite receiving care at a leading medical center, he died three days after receiving the Moderna vaccine.
2. South Korean Study: Reported by Choi et al., a young male presented to the hospital shortly after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. He died within eight hours of admission—an acute rate of mortality rarely observed even in severe heart attacks. Histopathological examination showed extensive, severe tissue inflammation throughout the myocardium.
3. Connecticut Case Series: Published in the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine by Gill et al., two teenage boys (ages 16 and 17) died several days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Both were found deceased at home. Autopsies conducted with input from pathology teams at the University of Michigan and the University of Minnesota definitively identified Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis as the cause of death.

These autopsy-confirmed findings are documented in peer-reviewed literature and demand rigorous medical scrutiny.

Chapter 4: VAERS Data and Patient Impact

We must evaluate the biological mechanism driving these outcomes. The mRNA formulations from Pfizer and Moderna, alongside the viral vector platform from Janssen, instruct cells to synthesize the viral spike protein. This protein acts as an agent of cellular damage when systemically distributed. While acute myocarditis exhibits variations based on genetic predisposition and batch variations, ongoing vaccination campaigns inherently carry a risk of acute myocarditis cases.

Data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reflects a significant shift in reporting patterns:

Historical Baseline vs. COVID-19 Era Reporting (VAERS Data)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-2021 Average:    ~200–300 reported deaths annually (all vaccines combined)
Cumulative Post-2021: 38,670+ reported deaths worldwide associated with COVID shots
Immediate Onset:     9,228 reported deaths occurred within 0–2 days of injection

While VAERS reports represent raw observational signals rather than definitive proof of causal link, the temporal cluster requires formal investigation. Furthermore, many individuals reporting post-vaccination health changes have struggled to secure clinical acknowledgment or targeted treatment protocols from health institutions.

Patients suffering long-term post-vaccination complications require objective medical evaluation, empathetic clinical care, and targeted therapeutics rather than dismissal.

Chapter 5: Mechanism of Harm and Evaluating Efficacy

The synthetic messenger RNA used in these platforms was engineered with modified nucleosides to increase durability and resist enzymatic degradation. Consequently, both mRNA and spike proteins have been detected across multiple organ systems—including cardiac tissue, brain tissue, and vascular beds—for extended periods post-injection. Studies indicate circulating spike protein remains in the blood six to nine months following administration, with subsequent boosters re-introducing additional load.

Regarding population-level outcomes and claims that the vaccines saved millions of lives: prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrated efficacy against symptomatic infection initially, but were not designed or powered to demonstrate reductions in all-cause mortality or hospitalization over extended periods.

The overall reduction in COVID-19 mortality over the course of the pandemic can be attributed to three primary factors:

1. Natural Immunity: The widespread acquisition of naturally acquired post-infection immunity across both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
2. Early Outpatient Treatment: The development and deployment of early multi-drug protocols and therapeutic interventions that managed patients at home, reducing emergency room visits and hospital admissions.
3. Viral Evolution: The natural mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into milder, less lethal variants (such as the Omicron lineages).

Public health claims and regulatory messaging must remain grounded in rigorous clinical evidence, transparent safety surveillance, and verifiable data.

stock here, this follow the recent High Hit….see recent post. This one was quite deep, could signal a new magma explotation path at 34.5 km and directly underneath.

stock here: They would have a lot better sucess in just infiltrating and controlling the opposition, although they are doing some of that too.

A-Eye Bullet Points

The “Democracy Files” — The Alleged Plan in 10 Points

https://goyimx.com/CynicalPublius/status/2113751890916004057

Glenn does a good analysis of what should we do, what should Trump and the Feds do?

According to an October 2026 investigation published by DataRepublican:

– 1. Former USAID officials allegedly organized a network to apply foreign regime-change strategies inside the United States.

– 2. The objective: Prepare to challenge the Trump administration’s legitimacy during a constitutional or election crisis.

– 3. The strategy — “4 B’s”: Block, Bridge, Belong, Build. Obstruct government actions, build public support, and pursue structural reforms.

– 4. Coordinated opposition: The reporting links groups such as Indivisible, No Kings, MoveOn, and 50501 to a broader activist network.

– 5. Secret umbrella organization: An alleged United Democracy Alliance (UDA) coordinates protests, legal challenges, and contingency planning.

– 6. Military and intelligence veterans: National Security Leaders for America, reportedly involving approximately 1,600 former officials, allegedly assists with planning.

– 7. Trigger events: Invoking the Insurrection Act against protesters, disputed elections, or delays in seating elected officials could trigger coordinated resistance.

– 8. Governors’ involvement: Plans reportedly discuss states refusing federal cooperation and potentially convening an alternative governing assembly.

– 9. Foreign influence: The network reportedly consulted international democracy-transition specialists about applying similar strategies in America.

– 10. The ultimate concern: Some participants reportedly discussed using a national crisis to fundamentally restructure American governance.

Important distinction: These are allegations and interpretations presented in DataRepublican’s reporting, not independently established conclusions. The supplied material references recordings and documents but does not, by itself, establish an illegal conspiracy, a coordinated coup, or agreement among all named organizations.

Bottom line: The central allegation is that an organized network is preparing to use a potential constitutional crisis as an opportunity for major political and governmental change. Whether that constitutes legitimate contingency planning, partisan resistance, or an unlawful effort to replace constitutional government depends on evidence and actions beyond the allegations presented.

==========================

stock, if you have any theories, let me know. Why wasn’t he prosecuted?

h/t cuttlefish

stock here: worth watching on Bitchute, break the YouTube power monopoly.

stock here: NBC News Mulatto Meghan Markle, who lived half a block from me in Evanston, IL, is the accuser, she found out Dad was accused of possessing child porn. And not just porn, but also “abuse” but wouldn’t it all be abuse by definition?

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/united-kingdom/meghan-statement-thomas-markle-child-sexual-abuse-images-allegations-rcna605181

What could possibly cause her to make this statement, 8 years after “discovery”? Something odd is going on.

——-

Ohio, a crucial swing state, is now running a highly abused child as Governor (democrat of course).

Amy Acton

Her mom claims that she has lied her entire life, a portion of that ad is in this article, which tries to debunk, concluding “false”. How weak is that, but maybe good enough for the baseless base.

stock here: One thing I am sure of, those girls that have been sexually abused at a really young age, like 12 in this case, carry a huge burden all their life, and they are likely to have at least personality quirks, if not full on hatred for all humans but even more likely more targeted at men. This is not to blame the victim, but to recognize that they are unlikely to be strong and fair leaders. Her lying is a different matter, which NBC has not “debunked”, they have called it “False” as a barnum statement.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/ohio-mike-dewine-vivek-ramaswamy-take-down-ad-amy-acton-mom-rcna605006

stock here: I’ll have more on episode 55 also, Kilaeau eruption….

These high hits are sometimes just structural imbalances correcting themselves, and sometimes show magma moving. I used a slice and dice method in 2018 to map out the combined magma chamber of Mauna Loa and Kilaeau, and the upper Magma Chamber of Mauna Loa. It was tedious and super primative, but highly effective.

There is long, but very interesting description of the area below all the images. Curious the 1926 Aerial photography. At the bottom is a reference for a 103 page, LOL, hand typed report, for those who want to deep dive.

Mauna Loa summit: Understanding your labeled image

Your image captures one of the most geologically fascinating parts of Hawaiʻi: the summit of Mauna Loa and the beginning of its Southwest Rift Zone, where magma repeatedly fractures the volcano and creates new craters, fissures, and lava flows.

What’s especially interesting is that you’re looking at several different types of volcanic features formed by different processes, all within a relatively small area.

The 1926 and 1949 lava flows are particularly significant. The former was a destructive flank eruption, while the latter was primarily a summit eruption that dramatically modified South Pit.

1. The labeled features, north to south

Label in your image	Geological significance
Mauna Loa	Massive active shield volcano, elevation approximately 13,679 feet (4,169 m). Its broad summit contains the Mokuʻāweoweo caldera.
Lava Flow of 1949	Basaltic lava from the 1949 summit eruption. Lava cascaded into South Pit, eventually filling it sufficiently to overflow down the southeastern flank.
South Pit	A collapse-related pit crater at the southern end of the summit caldera complex. It was substantially modified and partly filled by the 1949 eruption.
Lua Hohonu	Hawaiian for deep pit. A distinct pit crater southwest of South Pit, associated with the summit’s extensional and collapse structures.
Lua Hou	Hawaiian for new pit. Another well-defined pit crater along the southwestward continuation of the summit fracture system.
Pōhaku Hanalei	A named summit-area rock/landmark southwest of the pit craters. Its precise geological origin is less clearly documented than the major craters.
Lava Flow of 1926	The upper portion of lava associated with the April 1926 eruption, which migrated down the Southwest Rift Zone and ultimately destroyed a coastal village.

The Smithsonian Global Volcanism Program independently identifies South Pit, Lua Hohonu, and Lua Hou as distinct pit craters.

Mauna Loa

+2

2. The pit craters: Why are there enormous holes in solid lava?

Your image nicely illustrates how these volcanic depressions align with the rift zone.

A pit crater isn’t necessarily formed by an explosive eruption. In basaltic volcanoes such as Mauna Loa, the process is often quite different.

Conceptual cross-section: withdrawal or redistribution of magma can remove support beneath the surface, allowing overlying basalt to collapse. Not a measured section of Lua Hou.

The mechanism generally involves magma draining or relocating within the volcanic plumbing system, fractures developing in the overlying rock, and blocks collapsing downward.

Importantly, Lua Hohonu and Lua Hou are not simply two small volcanic cones. They are depressions formed by collapse processes.

3. The 1949 eruption: Lava filling a crater

The 1949 eruption began on January 6. By January 23, lava fountains were reaching approximately 500 feet, with some bursts estimated above 800 feet.

Lava entered South Pit, progressively raising its floor. On January 25, it overflowed and traveled southeast, eventually reaching approximately 5.5 miles from the summit.

U.S. Geological Survey

In your image, the broad dark surface extending south from the summit is evidence of this relatively recent volcanic activity.

This illustrates an important point: lava eruptions can fill craters as well as create them. The shape of Mauna Loa’s summit is constantly being reconstructed by repeated episodes of collapse and lava emplacement.

4. The 1926 eruption: Exactly 100 years ago

5

Your annotation is historically significant, although the centennial was in April 2026, six months ago.

The chronology was:

• April 10: Eruption begins near South Pit, with lava fountains and fissures.
• April 13–14: Activity migrates southwest underground and opens new vents around 7,200–7,800 feet elevation.
• April 16: Lava crosses the island’s principal road.
• April 18: Lava destroys Hoʻōpūloa village, including homes, churches, and the harbor.
• Late April: Eruption ends.

An estimated 42 people were displaced. Remarkably, USGS personnel were mapping the summit during the initial eruption.

U.S. Geological Survey

+1

One distinction about your dashed turquoise arrow: it shows the general southwestward trend correctly, but the initial summit lava and the destructive coastal flow did not necessarily form one continuous surface stream. Magma migrated underground to lower-elevation fissures, which then produced the destructive lava.

5. Your red pin: Today’s High Hit

Your marked location, approximately 19°25′23.8″N, 155°36′32.4″W, lies on or close to the summit’s southwest rift system.

The dark, nearly parallel streaks you can see extending downslope are characteristic of the overlapping lava flows, channels, and eruptive structures along this rift. However, satellite imagery alone cannot establish the age of every dark flow.

The square purple and brown patches across the left side are almost certainly differences between satellite-image tiles, rather than rectangular geological formations.

6. Why the alignment matters

Look at the geometry:

South Pit → Lua Hohonu → Lua Hou → your red pin → Southwest Rift Zone.

These features roughly follow a structural weakness extending away from the summit. Magma can exploit fractures along this zone, sometimes erupting at the summit and sometimes traveling substantial distances underground before reaching the surface.

The 1926 eruption is an excellent demonstration of this process.

My biggest takeaway from your image: Although the surface appears ancient and motionless, parts of it were constructed or substantially modified just 77–100 years ago. On geological timescales, that is essentially yesterday.

For further examination, two unusually useful resources are the USGS 2026 centennial account of the 1926 eruption and the detailed geological mapping of the summit features.

The second contains a particularly relevant map showing South Pit, Lua Hohonu, Lua Hou, and lava units from different eruptions—almost exactly the region you’ve captured.

stock here: I have had this discussion several times in the last 2 weeks. The amount they have stolen, misallocated, received as kickbacks from the like of Ukraine. Over $100B for sure.

This served to bolster that data….they think Trump took $170B from “them”

https://www.lostfunds.org

the website itself is a POS. One example for Wisconsin….SNAP funding….they take credit for the $2.6B that was “slowed”, but then admit only $35M was “lost”.

But they come right out and “admit” this….$35M for housing for “migrant children” “selectively ended”, I wonder how much was being skimmed off….but to my point, why is this even a thing to begin with?

stock here: the left has no humility, no sense of shame.

@BarackObama https://t.co/wwIwpLLLDv

— Joe Pags Pagliarulo (@JoeTalkShow) October 18, 2026

Per Obama Tweet…..

It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old.

Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress.

There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen.

Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president.

And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.

The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.

It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.

stock here: Davidson also chiming in at this time, second video. It is impacts, or solar micro-Nova? The track record of near 12,000 cycles make the Impact theories less likely.

Mahalo to the Cuttlefish for this H/T

stock here: my brother follows this guy. Great analysis of mostly aviation accidents. He did completely miss the boat on the boat in Baltimore, LOL, and the Helo flown remotely into the passenger jet DC

stock here: my Idea – AI fleshed out

Breaking the Gatekeepers: How AI is Dismantling Service Cartels and Opaque Pricing

For decades, many specialized trades and white-collar services maintained an unspoken monopoly built entirely on information asymmetry. If you wanted to restore high-end stone, program a modern car key, or navigate local zoning laws, you weren’t just paying for labor—you were paying an artificial tax on hidden knowledge. These tightly held secrets allowed small networks of specialists to act like cartels, inflating prices because the average consumer had no alternative way to crack the code.

Today, artificial intelligence is systematically flattening these pricing moats. By turning opaque tribal knowledge into accessible, step-by-step guidance, AI is democratizing skills and forcing industries toward hyper-efficient, fair market pricing. Here are five more examples of specialized cartels and gatekeeper industries that AI is actively disrupting:

1. Automotive Diagnostics and Electronic Key Programming

For years, taking your car to a dealership or a specialized auto-locksmith meant facing staggering bills for services that felt shrouded in mystery—such as diagnosing obscure electronic dashboard codes or programming a new key fob. Dealerships often charged hundreds of dollars just to plug in a proprietary reader, leveraging the illusion that vehicle software was too complex for a layperson. AI-powered diagnostic platforms and open-source troubleshooting models now allow vehicle owners or independent mechanics to upload exact error codes, symptoms, and car models. The AI instantly translates complex CAN-bus errors into plain-language fixes, provides exact calibration sequences, and guides users through programming keys with cheap hardware, breaking the dealership’s diagnostic monopoly.

2. Architectural Drafting and Municipal Permitting

Navigating the labyrinth of local building codes, zoning restrictions, and structural engineering requirements has historically required hiring boutique drafting services and expensive “permit expediters.” These professionals made a living off the sheer confusion of municipal bureaucracy, charging thousands of dollars simply to format drawings to city standards. Generative AI tools and specialized code-compliance models can now cross-reference municipal zoning laws in seconds, instantly flagging code violations and generating structural layout drafts that align with local ordinances. While human sign-off is still legally required for major construction, AI strips away the inflated middleman fees traditionally charged just to get blueprints past the initial planning desk.

3. Boutique Tax Strategy and Estate Structuring

High-net-worth individuals and small business owners have long relied on elite CPA networks and estate-planning attorneys who guarded tax optimization strategies like state secrets. Billing at exorbitant hourly rates, these professionals maintained control by making tax codes look impenetrable. Modern reasoning AI models can ingest thousands of pages of current tax legislation, corporate structures, and financial data nearly instantaneously. By simulating various tax-loss harvesting scenarios, asset transfers, and entity formations, AI provides everyday business owners with institutional-grade financial strategies, democratizing advice that was once locked behind five-figure retainer walls.

4. Gemstone Grading and Fine Jewelry Appraisal

The fine jewelry and gemstone market has long relied on subjective, clubby evaluation networks. Appraisers and gemological grading labs often held immense power over market pricing, utilizing specialized lighting, proprietary terminology, and closed-loop valuation networks that left buyers completely dependent on their expert word. Computer vision AI and advanced spectrometry-trained models can now analyze microscopic inclusions, symmetry, fluorescence, and cut precision from high-resolution imagery and data inputs. By instantly benchmarking these metrics against global market transaction data, AI provides objective, transparent valuations that bypass the subjective gatekeeping of traditional appraisal cartels.

5. Commercial HVAC and Proprietary Equipment Diagnostics

Commercial property managers are all too familiar with the commercial refrigeration and HVAC trap: a walk-in cooler breaks down, and the manufacturer’s authorized service technician charges a fortune just to decipher a proprietary error code or reset a locked-out control board. These manufacturers intentionally obscure technical manuals to lock customers into expensive, long-term maintenance contracts. AI voice assistants and multimodal diagnostic tools are upending this dynamic. Technicians or handy facility managers can now point a smartphone camera or read error symptoms to an AI, which bypasses proprietary obfuscation by analyzing global parts catalogs, user forums, and cross-referenced service manuals to guide the user directly to the faulty capacitor or switch.

As AI continues to lower the barrier to specialized competence, the days of charging a massive premium purely for possessing secret information are numbered. The market is shifting from a economy of information hoarding to an economy of pure execution and transparent value.

Boom

stock here: of course first seen on CNN…..

https://www.cnn.com/videos/title-2600886?episode=2600890&source=subwall:vod:episode-2600890&iid=related-embed_streaming-now

stock here: Trump is really concerned about the mid-terms and rightfully so, he has pissed off so many of his supporters. And not just Trump, the entire Republican Controlled Senate and House, have not made efforts to codify Trump’s executive orders, so they be all be rolled back on Day 1 of a Democrat president. That can’t be just stupid, it has to be intentional. A betrayal of the constituents, again.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trump-strikes-deal-with-putin-for-russian-diesel-in-sharp-reversal-of-u-s-policy-ahead-of-midterms

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/10/10/trump-suggests-ukraine-remove-zelensky-and-replace-him-with-leader-who-can-make-a-deal

Using a conversion of approximately 7.45 barrels per metric tonne of diesel, here’s what Trump’s announced Russian diesel deal represents.

Conversion to barrels

Russian diesel commitment	Barrels	Equivalent U.S. diesel consumption
300,000 tonnes immediately	2.24 million	0.57 days
500,000 tonnes in November	3.73 million	0.95 days
1 million tonnes thereafter	7.45 million	1.90 days
1.8 million tonnes subtotal	13.41 million	3.42 days
3 million tonnes ultimate goal	22.35 million	5.70 days

These are approximate conversions; the exact barrels per tonne depend on diesel density.

U.S. daily consumption

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration:

All petroleum products

20.6M

barrels per day

Diesel / distillate

3.9M

barrels per day

These figures are based on 2025 consumption, with total petroleum demand also projected around 20.6 million barrels per day for 2026.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

+2

Against total U.S. petroleum consumption, the 300,000-tonne initial shipment represents just 2.6 hours of demand, and the entire 3-million-tonne target represents 1.08 days.

Bottom line

The initial 300,000 tonnes represents only about 14 hours of U.S. diesel consumption.

Even the eventual 3-million-tonne commitment equals less than six days of U.S. diesel demand, and it would be delivered over time—not all at once.

Importantly, Trump described these shipments as going to the American and global marketplace, so they are not necessarily all destined for the United States.

Reuters

+1

The announcement sounds substantial, but on a national or global energy scale, the volume is relatively modest. The actual effect on diesel prices will depend on how quickly the additional supply reaches markets and whether it represents a genuine increase in worldwide supply.