The Earth is very active! To get 3 big quakes like this in a month, is like a 1 in 67 month event. Big Deal.
Yes — treating it as M7.3 or greater, so every 7.3, 7.4 … 8.x and 9.x earthquake counts.
Using the century-scale dataset analyzed from the USGS PAGER worldwide catalog (1900–2011), supplemented with Global CMT through 2011), the catalog contains 1,761 M7+ events. The cumulative magnitude plot corresponds to about 681 earthquakes of M7.3+ over those 112 years. The study specifically found that at M≥7.3, the month-to-month occurrence pattern was statistically consistent with random timing rather than showing significant clustering.
That gives an observed rate of about 6.1 M7.3+ earthquakes/year, or 0.507 per month. Using that actual observed rate:
M7.3+ earthquakes in ~30 days
Frequency
Exactly 2
~7.7%
2 or more
~9.2%
3 or more
~1.5%
4 or more
~0.18%
So two or more M7.3+ earthquakes in a month occurs roughly once every 11 months.
But the more interesting comparison to your screenshot is actually three M7.3+ events:
Jul 17 — M7.3 Mexico
Aug 10 — M7.4 Colombia
Aug 14 — M7.7 Indonesia
USGS currently lists all three.
Those occurred within 28 days. On the century-scale rate, three or more M7.3+ in a one-month interval is only about 1.5% — roughly 1 month in 67, or about once every 5½ years on average.
So this current run is considerably more unusual than the “3 M7+” statistic we discussed earlier. It’s not an extreme once-a-century event, but three ≥7.3 in 28 days is legitimately a fairly rare global burst.
One technical distinction: the published study used fixed one-month bins rather than every possible rolling 30-day window, so “1 in 67 months” is the clean comparison; rolling windows would catch somewhat more clusters. The study used the actual earthquake catalog and found that M≥7.3 behaves close enough to Poisson/random timing that this rate calculation is justified by the data, rather than merely assumed.
If we push the cutoff to M7.5+, the current M7.7 would be the only one of these three, and the rarity changes dramatically.
stock here, this is one of the lengthier transcripts. Gemini refused to even deal with it.
New ▾Open ▾Edit ▾Save ▾Export ▾Import…◑ThemeDisplayTextHybridSplitWelcome.md×Caroline_Mansfield_Interview_Cleaned_Transcript(1).md×+
Caroline Mansfield Interview — Cleaned Transcript
Timestamps, music cues, and verbal fillers removed. Obvious automated-caption spelling errors were corrected; substantive claims were preserved as spoken.
What if some of the most important threats to human health are not only invisible but barely understood at all? For years, researchers have studied how chemicals, heavy metals, environmental pollutants, other contaminants enter the human body. But a growing area of research is now asking a far more unsettling question. Are the materials or signals inside the body that conventional medical testing is not designed to detect at all? And by the way, are people using it for nefarious purposes? My guest today has spent decades investigating that question. Caroline Mansfield is a registered naturopath, clinical researcher, live and dry blood analyst, specialist, and peer-reviewed scientific author.
For more than 25 years, she studied human blood, the effects of environmental toxins that may have an effect on the body. Her research has evolved through a series of human connected studies called the human signal or NLJD study, which is an investigation into whether signals consistent with electronic or resonant materials can be detected inside the human body. What the heck does that mean? And are these materials producing readings? And can they actually be removed from the body? So, are we walking around as some sort of antenna? So, that’s exactly what Caroline and her team have been studying for years, and she joins us now.
Thank you so much for being here. This is a this is a bizarre and incredibly important story, but thank you for your research. Oh, thank you for having me on today, Clayton. It’s an absolute pleasure and honor to be on your show to be able to really talk about the studies the research program particularly that I’ve been running for the last three years in relation to what we’re calling the transhuman agenda where they’re trying to make us into these biological digital beings. So we’re going from sort of a biological being to a biodigital being.
We’re moving away from Homo sapiens to homoborg genesis as Jesse calls it who’s been on your show previously. And I we’re becoming modified human beings and people still don’t really believe that. The technology is so advanced you can’t see it under a microscope. Well you can’t see the components of the technology under a microscope. You would need s transmission microscopy to go right down to the nano level. You wouldn’t see it with a light microscope, for example. So, it’s it’s it’s it’s hidden within us. It’s there within us. And the research program that I’ve been running we didn’t set out to look for these signals coming off the human body.
Each study kind of built, you know, led to more scientific questions to lead us to the next study. So originally we were just looking at environmental toxins and looking at ways to remediate those to remove those from the body. And you know I think explaining the journey that led us to this human signal study I think would be quite interesting for your audience as to how we got to where we did and how we discovered this. Yeah. I was in fact you took the words right out of my mouth because that’s where I wanted to start like what was the trigger for you?
You’re looking at environmental toxins.
Is I think things we all are used to reading about going back to you know silent spring and DDT you know being sprayed and killing bald eagles like we’re very aware of like the pesticides and all of these things in our environment I think a lot of us are or what’s sprayed on our fruit or you know those sorts of things we’re obviously seeing the Taco Bell lettuce story that’s that’s been making its rounds so we’re very aware of that but what was like the trigger point or the pivot point for you to start asking the question, wait a minute, maybe there are things here that we can’t even see that are affecting the human body and what were the changes in the human body that you were seeing that you just couldn’t you couldn’t correlate to maybe these environmental toxins.
Yeah. So, I mean, my journey has been obviously a naturopath for 25 years and I’ve been seeing patients over this time. Then my work sort of moved into running clinical studies for companies looking at products and proving our efficacy that the products are doing what they say they’re going to do. So, I worked for different companies looking at EMF EMFs and basically how they affect the blood as well. I know Dr. Robert Young was doing a study on the BBC back in 1996 when we were looking at 2G and he was proving in a study that was ed back then showing how these EMFs affect our blood.
They cause a lot of red blood cell aggregation and they cause a breakdown of the red blood cells. And then many years later, I was doing very similar study, but now we’re up to 5G. And when you hold your phone just for 10 minutes, you can see the changes in your blood are significant. So, a lot of people when they’re sitting in front of their computer, for example, and they’re starting to get cold extremities, brain fog, they can’t think straight, they’re getting headaches, they blame it on, oh, it’s this the computer.
I’ve been sitting too long. I’ve been staring too long. But actually, when you actually look at your blood, you can see that it’s become highly coagulated. There’s a lot of what we call rouleaux, the sticking together of red blood cells. So now the blood’s not flowing delivering oxygen etc. So all of these studies I realize over the years are all they all mean something. They’ve all come together to mean something. It’s a bit like when things happen to you in life and you look back and you realize the pieces all fitted together.
And I feel this has been my personal journey. So in 2023 a newly established company was born and they were looking they had produced a formula which was a detox product. This is the masterpiece product and they asked me whether I would look at the product under the microscope and be able to evaluate it in any way. And I said well that’s all very well but when we look at a product under a microscope this is qualitative analysis and it’s not going to tell us really how your product’s detoxing the body.
So I said why don’t we run some proper studies on it with third party lab testing and this is where the whole journey began. So this was soon after the roll out of the COVID shots and I really wanted to run a study on graphene oxide because there was a lot of talk that this was inside the COVID shots you know among many other nefarious ingredients and I was asking up and down the labs in the UK can we test for graphene oxide and the answer would be no and I would say why not they said because it’s not in the human body so it was just fortuitous.
I found a lab in Germany. It was called IGL lab and or IGL labor laboratory and they were the top epigenetics and environmental toxins lab in Europe and they had been testing not only graphene oxide but up to 900 different environmental toxins in the blood since 2009. So I went back to the company and said look I found this company let this lab let’s let’s do some research. Let’s get a small pilot study going and let’s see whether this product can remove. We were looking at plastics, microplastics and also forever chemicals but we included the graphene oxide.
So we started the study and lo and behold the baseline results of the test subject showed high and very high levels of graphene oxide. Now two of the test subjects had been vaccinated and one of them hadn’t. I put myself in the study because I wanted to evaluate the product myself, see what effects it had on me. And when you have a small study group like that, the only variable would be that somebody wasn’t taking the product. So you couldn’t guarantee that. We’re not inside. It’s not a clinical study like you would have for pharmaceuticals for example where you everyone’s u food is controlled, air is controlled, you know, supplements are controlled.
So I put myself in the study and then what I realized was my graphene oxide levels came back high but I had never taken the COVID shot. So this all this information was very interesting and quite shocking to be honest. So the test subjects including myself started taking the product. And what we noticed initially on the 35-day mark, one of the test subjects, graphene oxide levels reduced down to by 90% after 35 days of taking the product at five drops twice a day. And I we were speaking with Dr. Carrie Mday at the time who was in tears because this is quite groundbreaking.
No one has been able to do studies with graphene oxide Clayton. If you try and find a lab in America, you won’t find one. Nobody is testing the blood for graphene oxide anywhere. So, we carried on with the study because of the direct relationship to the vax. Well, it’s just not one of those ingredients that’s allowed to be tested. If you went to a clear license lab in America, you would lose your license. Okay? So, you can go and test for all the heavy metals and other environmental toxins, but graphene oxide is on the list nowhere.
So I don’t think they want people to know that this is inside your body. And as I said this was the only lab I found and I think it was very fortuitous. I found this lab at the time. So this the test I show sorry I should tell you the test that we did was called the intracellular electrical capacity test of the lymphocytes. So lymphocytes go around the body and they drink up the extracellular fluid. They’re sentinels, so they give off information to let us know to warn, you know, the system if there’s a potential threat or what they’re picking up on.
So, this is why the lymphocytes are used in this test. They’re testing the lymphocytes to see what toxins they’ve come up against inside the body. That’s how this test works. So, it was the intracellular electrical capacity blood test. So, the we also we continue to take the product until the 90-day mark. Everybody had was tested again and everyone’s levels came down. So where everyone was starting off at the high and very high ranges and all of these toxins, we tested for polypropylene, polyethylene, PFOAs, PFOS and graphene oxide. Everyone started off at the high and very high levels.
They came down except for one came down exceptionally low by 90%. But we all came down to what we call the borderline levels which is below I think it’s 300 nanomoles per liter and then by the end of the study everyone had come down to what they call the tolerable range before below 149 nanomoles per liter. So you can see this tracking down. So we knew that this product was removing these toxins including plastics which is phenomenal. But now we had this baseline study for graphene oxide. So the company said great this is a pilot study now let’s go on and do a proper study.
So we had a much larger cohort and a placebo group. We had I think it was 22 or 25 participants with a placebo. So we started to run that study but this time we were looking at in the electro intracellular electrical capacity test with 27 analytes including things like atrazine which is the hormone disrupting chemical which causes body dysmorphia and that was used in a study on frogs where the male frogs turn to female frogs and that was using the I think it was one part per billion of atrazine was what they used in that study.
And American tap water has three parts per billion. This is crazy. So I know I mean I interviewed Alex Jones years ago and I had dinner with him and we were all myself and Tucker Carlson. We were all sort of sitting there and he started talking about frogs, frogs that were turning gay and we were all just sort of joking about it like come on Alex, like this can’t be happening. And sure enough, it actually is happening. And but the fact that it’s in tap water and that people as a result then like where is all this body dysmorphia coming from?
Like why are young people suddenly like running to clinics and wanting to have their genitals cut off and want to transition? Like where is this coming from? It’s like it came out of nowhere. Or did it come from atrazine or other chemicals that are in our drinking water? Yeah, I think it’s a mixture of the messaging, you know, the propaganda that people don’t realize is happening subtly on a daily basis com combined with chemicals that alter the way you think and feel. So, yeah, quite shocking.
So, we had a we had yeah, we had a list of 27 analytes we’re going to use for that study, but we also included a hair analysis and a urine analysis test to test for heavy metals just to prove out that this product could remove heavy metals as well, even though there’s thousands of studies on zeolite itself. And then we got everyone’s baselines, Clayton. And they all came back and everyone again was high and very high in graphene oxide and so many of these environmental toxins that we were testing for.
And we were waiting just before the 35-day mark when we were going to retest everybody. I got a message from the lab in Germany saying they were having problems with the calibration of their equipment and they couldn’t do the testing and we’d already just sent off all the blood at great expense. But it sort of crossed over they said with their issue they were having so we couldn’t use that blood and we were thinking okay we’re not going to get the 35-day mark we’ll go for the 60-day mark on this study for that for the environmental toxins.
So, everyone continued to take the masterpiece product or the placebo on that particular study. And before we even got to the 60-day mark, I got an email from the lab telling me that the owner had suddenly died. They were no longer offering this environmental toxicity test. The lab closed. It didn’t reopen again for 6 months. And when they did reopen, they were now offering like a mitochondrial efficiency test. That test that they had been offering since 2009 was now no longer. You couldn’t communicate with the lab that you would email them.
You would try and phone them. I believe that the company tried to get somebody in Germany to go and visit the lab. The whole place was shut down. So that’s not usual when a lab owner dies to shut down the whole operation. And what we believe potentially was happening is because at that time we were going online ex letting the world know that we’ve just completed the study for graphene oxide in people and this was the only lab I could find and I’ve asked around many practitioners and no one else had been able to find a lab that would test for graphene oxide.
So at that point that was I mean it was obviously a bad day for our study but it was a bad day for the human race because now we can’t test for graphene oxide. So at the end of that study we got all the results back and we showed you know categorically that this product was removing a lot of these heavy metals including radionuclides like cesium and plutonium in the body. People had that had that in them. You wouldn’t believe that yeah all these different chemicals and radioactive substances in the body but we were able to prove out that this particular product was removing these from the body.
So we were happy with that part but then we got to thinking okay so if we’ve moved remove the graphene oxide there was a study that came up and it was called the Bluetooth documentary I don’t know if you’ve heard of that. No I haven’t. Okay. So this is Dr. Chavez out of Mexico and he ran a study small a small group again six people who had been vaccinated and he took them out to the middle of nowhere in the technology-free environment. The whole thing was filmed proving out that people were emitting MAC addresses.
So human beings were emitting MAC addresses. Yes. MAC addresses. Yes. And there was another study called the French experiment where they used 30 test subjects and again they were all emitting MAC addresses. So that study is actually open source and you can go and look at that study online the equipment that was used. And you know during that the Bluetooth documentary which anyone can search online and see these Bluetooth addresses were coming out of gravestones as well. You know people buried after taking well around the co time. So that was interesting for us and we thought well if we’ve proven that actual graphene oxide is in people then I wonder if we can do a study around the Bluetooth signal to see whether by taking the product it’s it turns off the MAC address.
If this is part of the self assembling technology used for the antenna for as a lot of papers have shown. So I was asked to run a study. So I started just to test people with an app that was used in the Bluetooth documentary alongside the professional grade equipment and followed their protocol. I contacted Dr. Chavez and he told me his protocol. And lo and behold, when I was taking people into the middle of fields 600 ft away from anyone because that is the is the circumference for Bluetooth to go out.
People were emitting MAC addresses. I was picking up like a radar a radar facility on this particular app. So you could see them moving. I say walk away from me, walk towards me and you can see they and they had no technology on them. So I called I phoned back to the company. I said, “I think we may have a study here.” I said, “But I can’t be the study the person doing the testing. I’m not qualified in this area.” I said, “I need to find someone.” So I had a good search around and I found a technical expert in Bulgaria who had been doing this research for four years and he had actually been speaking at telecommunication conferences and government on the phenomenon trying to warn people that this is what he’s been picking up on as well.
So I approached him and said, “Look, I we really want to run a study, but we want to do it with professional-grade equipment, not just with apps, and we want to use the exact same equipment that’s been used in the Bluetooth documentary and the French experiment study.” So he said he’s very familiar with all that technology and agreed to do the study. So he flew out to the UK and we did this study but we wanted to also have it filmed so no one could critique or say we’ve made it up.
So we had a top film producer Cristiana Vanik who is from Holland and she agreed to come and do all the filming. She wasn’t going to make a documentary about it but she just agreed I’ll film everything for you. So we knew she was a very good person to be doing that for us. So, we would meet everybody in the middle of a field. They would have to go through the woods across two fields to get to our temporary base station where we had all the equipment set up for the study.
And we would they would walk across the woods, walk across the field, and by the time they were halfway to through the second field, would start to pick up pick them up on this equipment and on the app. It’s it’s hard for people to understand this, but when you see it, I mean, I was shocked. You mentioned the gravestones thing when I had Jesse Beltron on who’d been studying this for years. And when they were able to track the individuals who died after having taken the COVID shot and they their bodies were whether filled with graphene oxide or whether they’re six feet under the ground and they’re standing there in a graveyard and picking up Bluetooth signals from the bodies that are dead.
Yes. They’re giving off this signal and this is in our bodies. It’s astonishing. I’ve told friends about this and they just there their mouth hits the floor. Yeah. It’s it’s unbelievable for people to comprehend this. And you even myself running the study, I would go home at night and I’d have to close the book, I call it, because it’s too much for me to comprehend. It’s it’s it’s very dark. Like no one has agreed to this. And also the I mean just the other part of it too just having the convenience of this clinic this lab suddenly shutting down mysteriously telling you that they don’t do these studies anymore German company.
It reminds me of another journalist I interviewed years ago who was doing sampling of the soil samples from underneath where the CIA presumably blew up the Nordstream pipeline. And he managed to get soil samples and send them. He did it clandestinely to a German lab. And I think once they figured out that he was presenting soil samples from the Nordstream P, they basically shut down the entire study. Said, “Sorry, we can’t do that.” So, there’s enormous pressure. It’s remarkable that people, the powers that be, don’t want this information getting out there because they were looking for explosive residue and other things like that could have been traced back to certain state governments.
And so, anyway, I’m not surprised when I heard that. Well, he was a brave man doing that as well. So, I mean, it is incredible. I the fact that this chap just died suddenly and there’s no information about it. You know, it was it was just terrible at the time. So, go back to the masterpiece part of this. I, you know, as fans of the show know, I’ve been taking it for quite a while and I find it incredible. And you know, you wonder, so you never took the COVID shot and you know, there are lots of people who haven’t, but then you were still finding like some of these chemicals in your body like graphene oxide and other things.
So, it’s not just for people that took the COVID shot, right? No. No, it’s not. And this is what the preliminary study we found with the MAC address study. It wasn’t just those who had the shot. What I found was the people who had the MAC address. I didn’t have a MAC address and I hadn’t taken the shot obviously but the it was mainly people who had taken the shot that did have the MAC address but also partners of people who taken the shot. So if they hadn’t but their partner had they would test positive.
So there is an element of transfection to do with this. And I’ve spoken to a nano chemist and he’s saying if you think about it this nanotechnology is so small it can go through pores of skin. So when you’re sweating, when you’re talking, when you’re breathing, you can take it in. This is why this is why there is an element of transfection with it. So I do believe so when someone when you hear these people I see people in our chat room a lot that say I’m a pure blood. I never took the shot.
You know pure blood. Eh. Yeah. Have you ever have you ever, you know, hugged a person that took the shot? Have you ever been in the same room with a person that took the shot? So there’s transfection, right? Yeah, there is an element of transfection, but because I didn’t actually have a MAC address, so that made me question, well, maybe when you take the shot and you’re getting it put straight into your veins, and maybe there is you are getting something else that maybe can’t be transfected, but it’s it’s all hypothesis we can’t quite work out at the moment.
It’s it’s still like a jigsaw puzzle, you know, a lot of this information. Some people know a lot more, way more than me, and some people less. So, I’m just where I’m at with what I know. But let me just finish about this MAC address study. We had everyone come back 35 days later and it was filmed again. Everybody was still testing positive for the MAC address. We were a little bit sad cuz we thought that initial test subject who had a 90% reduction, we thought maybe somebody would, you know, would be switched off.
So, we asked them to continue taking this product and come back 7 weeks later. And there we are with our action station all set up and all ready to go. And suddenly one of the test subjects appeared around the trees and we were, oh, we didn’t pick up didn’t pick them up on the on the computer or on the app. So, we thought there was something wrong with the equipment. So, we turned everything off and turned everything on again. And lo and behold, there was no signal. So, wow. Okay, it appears that your signal has been turned off.
So, we had the next test subject turn up. Again, they didn’t appear on the screen. They had no signal. By the time the last test subject turned up, nobody had a signal. And that day was quite euphoric because that meant that by taking this product for I think it was 11 weeks. And what we believe is by removing the graphene oxide that it turned off this MAC address that they had been tested positive for at least three or four times before we started the study. Wow. So that was Yeah. So we thought we’d found well hey we found the answer.
Great. We can tell people there is a there is a solution. And at least this solution for now. I’m sure there’ll be others. And then we got a phone call from Jesse and he phoned up the company and he said, “Well, hang on a moment. This isn’t just it.” He said, “There’s more to it than just the MAC address. We’ve been testing the MAC address as well.” but that doesn’t mean that they’re not testing positive for these anomalous signals coming off the human body, these semiconductor material signals. So he called me the company referred him to me and I was going through the MAC address study and what I haven’t explained is that during that study there was a specific signal that was coming off the people.
It was it was it was one packet per second is the signal and the closest signal to that would be the find me mode in your iPhone. You know, when you switch your phone off, it’s still giving out a signal mode. IOS on the app, the iPhone, the Apple iPhone, excuse me. When you power off the phone, it’ll still have a find me pinging that lets you if you lost it. Yeah, that gives off two packets per second. So, let me just explain. If you have a gimbal camera, for example, that’s giving off 125 packets per second.
It’s getting a lot of information from the camera to you know transferring it to your computer. So this one packet per second is a small amount of information. We don’t know what it’s giving off or whether it’s two-way you know for that as well. But yeah it and so when I told that to Jesse he was like okay that’s exactly what we found. We found that exact same signal. So he knew we’d done the testing correctly and he said right I’m really keen to do another study with you and I want to test if people were to take this product whether it’s going to be helping to remove the signal.
So, this is how this next study progressed. Because unbeknownst to me, by the time I spoke to him, he’d already been giving the product to some of his I wouldn’t call him his patients, but the people that he’s been helping with Havanaype syndrome symptoms and they had some remediation by taking the product. And he said this is the first time he’s ever given them something that they feel there’s a relief from their symptoms. Wow. So he yeah he flew out to the UK and we set up another study and this time we had 22 participants.
So, we were gathering these participants for this study and it was this is probably the most emotional study actually because when you’re in a room with Jesse, so he was a third party tester now when you’re watching him scan people in this way and they’re they’re lighting up at specific focal points around their body with the nonlinear junction detector scanner. So it’s picking up on second harmonics which is semiconductor material in the body and it’s not random.
These are in specific places I think at nerve endings your nerve density endings and they’re and they’re above the front the third eye you know on the crown of the head the back of this occipital area of the of the head the left and right TMJ the outside of the shoulders on the pecs on the scapulas there are specific points that lit up the same places in everybody if they were there so we had a schematic of a human body for each test subject that he was testing. And we were marking the points and also the intensity of the frequency by percentage which is given off by the actual tool.
And so we gathered the data on 22 test subjects. And there was one particular chap who had avoided having the COVID shot and he was hoping that he was going to be very low. And he was one of the highest and he was in tears. He said because during COVID he went into hospital because he broke his wrist and he needed to have an operation and one of the hospitals were insisting he has a COVID shot and he left that hospital in the middle of the night because he said I’m not having it.
They said we can’t operate on you unless you have it. So he left and he went to another hospital who said yeah we’ll we’ll we’ll operate on you and they were still asking him about the COVID shot but they had agreed to go ahead with the operation without having it. But what he didn’t realize is when he signed the consent form one where it’s saying if we need to make an intervention during the operation if something you know happens or comes up you’re agreeing that we will be able to do an intervention and it’s listing what those particular interventions could be and one of them is to give you biologics.
Now biologics by definition vaccines come under by biologics and he believes that whilst he was under they gave him the vaccine. So a lot of people go into hospital not realizing when they sign that consent form they’re allowing themselves to have the shot. So he was very upset because he hadn’t felt right since he had it. And his wife was also tested and she was very high. So yeah, it was a very emotional study. But what was very interesting, Clayton, is that I invited the three of the test subjects who were on the MAC address study to be part of this study because I was very keen to see what their what they were testing at with Jesse’s equipment having taken Masterpiece at the beginning of the study.
And the low one of the lowest scores or the lowest score was a lady who’d been on the MAC address study who’d been taking Masterpiece consistently. And the second lowest score was one the other participant who continues to take Masterpiece after the MAC address study. So we’re looking at this study came on about 2 and a half to 3 months later. So that gave us some hope that these signals were going to be reduced in the whole cohort. One of the test subjects from the MAC address study, I said, “Stop taking it.” And when she came in to be tested by Jesse, she was she had high levels of return signals with Jesse.
So, we know that this technology is getting in us even if we stop taking it that it’s going to continue to build somehow. So, it’s in our environment, it’s in our food, what is it with transfection, the water we’re drinking. So, you can’t say it’s a bit like cleaning your teeth. If I clean my teeth, I’m done. It’s like you have to keep working at removing this technology and removing these toxins from your body. That was one thing that we did discover. So, everybody took the product for 60 days and the study dosage was 15 drops twice a day.
I’m not suggesting people take that amount. It is a very potent product. Not to say that people are having u problems taking it, but everyone’s individual. And if you’re a little bit toxic or you know your lymphatic system’s a bit bunged up then you may need some extra support or you may need to go in a bit slower and then build up to the four or five drops a day. But the study dosage was 15 drops twice a day and nobody had any issues. In fact, everyone was feeling amazing on it which I’m going to come on to.
So everyone came back after 60 days and Jesse flew back over from the States and he was testing everybody again and the room kind of went quiet because on the baseline testing the buzzer would go off. It’s a very noisy piece of equipment. Every time he hit a node, you know, the buzzer would make a loud a loud sound. But this time he was passing the buzz the nonlinear junction scanner over the people and there was very few buzzing and even Jesse’s drawer was you know open he was wow this is much less than you know at the baseline.
So obviously we had our schematics out we’re plotting all the active spots and the percentage that the machine was giving for each active spot and what we discovered was at the end of the study that there had been a 78% reduction in the return signals out of in the cohort from baseline. So this is roughly 78% Wow. Yeah. Reduction. And Jesse said, “I’ve never seen this.” I’ve never seen this ever that these signals drop. And the other thing he’s never seen is that a lot of the signals, especially around the head, had completely disappeared.
So a lot of people had these on the head, you know, in front of their third eye, the top of the head, at the lower the lower base of their head at the, you know, the top of their neck and the right and left TMJ those and also on the nasal dorsum and on most of the people they were gone and he was I’ve never seen this. So there was tears of joy at the end of that study and especially the chap who was very high, he was one of the lowest when he came back after.
How did he feel? Did was he did he feel completely different? Well, he did and a lot of them did. So, what we also ran separately what we call an heart rate variability test alongside the testing that Jesse was doing. So, at baseline, I took everyone’s heart rate variability, which is showing how balanced your autonomic nervous system is. And that is a marker for good health. And at the end of the study, everybody’s heart rate variability had improved. So by removing this technology which is affecting us, you know, with our nervous system, everyone’s nervous systems had calmed down and was more in balance.
And what we found was that by removing this technology people were feeling more joy they were feeling more energy and they were sleeping better and dreaming better. So whether it can be that this technology removing removes the background noise in the body, the agitation so people are sleeping more deeply and of course when you sleep more deeply and you go into REM you’re clearing your brain through the lymphatic system of all the rubbish that’s in your brain. So maybe this is another way why there was a lot of clearance from the head of this technology and there people were dreaming better and people saying they feel like a childlike joy.
They hadn’t experienced for a long time. So there was a lot of amazing anecdotal experiences that people were telling us about which are all recorded. And the other thing I forgot to mention is that the die suddenly team were there to film this whole study. So this is now going to be in the next film that comes out by this die suddenly team die suddenly too to show again that everything that we’re saying that I’m telling you was recorded and you couldn’t say oh we’re just making it up all the results every aspect of it was recorded.
Yeah. I mean it’s it’s remarkable. And I mean I can just say from my own personal use of it, it’s just been, you know, incredible. Great. You know, and I was sort of warned before taking it like you’re going to have the best night’s sleep in a long time. And I like to think, well, you know, the thing is I’m surrounded by electronics on a regular basis. And you think about all of the different whatever sort of particles and graphene oxide and other sort of environmental toxins that we’re completely you know surrounded by or affected by on a regular basis.
Can you talk about really quickly before we let you go like what’s actually in it? Yeah. So the product is made of it’s it’s got the most powerful detoxifier I believe there is because it’s highly magnetized. It’s made of zeolites, natural zeolites which are formed when the volcanic ash hits the sea and it makes these beautiful crystalline crystals and they’re called zeolites. And the only ones fit for human consumption is clinoptilolite. And if you look at any zeolite supplement on the market, it will always be clinoptilolite. And so this powerful negative charge because the company were able to get this clinoptilolite down to the nano range what it does is when it you put the drops under your tongue it goes through your mucous membranes in your mouth.
It goes everywhere in the body where water goes. So it’s going through all into your interstitial fluid your extracellular fluid and it’s picking up toxins which have a powerful positive charge. So it’s grabbing hold of them. It’s also covered in sea minerals because the product is paired with sea mineral plasma. So the beauty of this product is when it’s when it’s picking up a toxin, it’s releasing minerals at a place where a toxin was. So a lot of the time metals will act like a mineral. It’s, you know, it’s a poor brother of the actual mineral.
It can do some work but it’s not working as efficiently for that cell. So the minute that toxin is removed and it’s replaced with minerals that cell can start working better as well. So not only is it grabbing hold of toxins u removing it from the body just through the process of urination, defecation, sweat, perspiration and respiration and in women menstruation. So it’s coming out in all different ways and also in your hair because we’ve discovered that as well. When that cell is starting to work better in itself because now it’s got the minerals that it’s needed then the cell can start saying hey we’re having a bit of a detox here because it’s picking up on what the body’s doing and so the body will start cleansing itself as well.
So it’s giving the body a chance to recalibrate itself as well as the product removing the toxins. So yeah it’s a beautiful product in that way. It’s also molecularly identical to your blood in as far as the pH. So it’s a colloidal solution. So the body recognizes it straight away when it’s under the tongue and just goes straight into the body. And because it grabs hold of toxins, there’s very little what we call herxheimer reaction. So a lot of the time when we’re trying to detox, a lot of products will go in sort of stir up the toxins.
Then you have to take extra chelating agents and hope you’re catching all the toxins before it leaves the body. And a lot of the time people can get, you know, detox reactions such as headaches or feeling fatigued, maybe skin reactions, nausea, things like that. But on all the studies I’ve run, I’ve only had one or two clients at the very beginning of the study that have maybe felt like a little bit of a reaction. So I say, “Well, just go back to one drop twice a day, then increase to two drops twice a day, three drops, and by the time they’re back up to five drops, they’re fine.” So it’s like anything, you know, just go in slow.
If you’re very sensitive, if you haven’t detoxed before, that’s important to know as well. So about up to about five drops at each time. Yeah. So on the on the actual bottle, it says four drops twice a day. Our studies have always been around five drops twice a day and sometimes up to 15 drops twice a day. But what I should also say is that on this study with Jesse, there was one test subject who just took five drops twice a day, not the 15 drops, and she was one of the highest she had the best results out of just about everybody on five drops twice a day.
So just because our study was running at 15 drops twice a day, it doesn’t mean to say that five drops twice a day, you know, may not be, you know, efficient for some other people. So it doesn’t mean to say you have to go in hard and heavy. As Dr. Young says, you know, less more often is better than more less often, right? Yeah. So just a little bit at a time to build up. Yeah, this is incredible. We’ll have links in the description if people want to want to try it out.
And I think we even have like a discount code that we can give people down there as well if they want to try it out. I take it now every day and it’s incredible. And it tastes like seawater. Just a little few drops under the tongue, it tastes like seawater. And again, just being surrounded by all of these toxins and EMF radiation and all these other things. And now with the coming 6G technology which is about to be rolled out on top of it. So there’s no getting away from this stuff.
That’s the scary part. So, we’ve got to protect ourselves in other ways with what we put into our bodies. Caroline, any final thoughts on this? I’m just sort of I’m just really I’m just I’m sort of blown away by all of this. So, thank you for your for your time. Well, thank you for allowing me to come on to talk about these studies. I feel like these are the most important studies right now for humanity because nobody else is doing the human testing in relation to this technology that’s being found in everybody.
And I was listening to your interview with the NSA whistleblower. Recently and he was talking about how this surveillance has stepped up since 911 when the government did negotiations with telecommunication companies to collect data and now you know everything we do from the minute we wake up to the minute we go to sleep it’s all everything’s been collected hence all these ridiculous data centers and you know in my mind the way I see this if you don’t want to if you want to try and avoid this technology from the only way to avoid it to stop you becoming a modulated human being is to really look after your body to detox to take something like Masterpiece.
We also found that people who move a lot who exercise and who sweat a lot they also had the lowest levels and the baseline of our study. So it’s really important to be looking after your body at this time because of what’s been rolling out and I feel like this has become this collection of data has become omniscient. It’s become omnipresent. It’s everywhere it’s becoming very knowledgeable. It’s everywhere from the minute you wake up everywhere you go you’ve got cameras. And it’s becoming omnipotent. You know it’s it’s become anyone who has this data this knowledge is powerful.
And this should only be God’s work. I feel like they’re creating a digital avatar of God, you know. So, I feel this is a spiritual a spiritual warfare that’s happening. So if you want to protect your families and your loved ones right now, then, you know, please pass on this message to get this technology out of you. I’m sure I’m I’m hoping that there’s going to be more and more studies that we can run and that other people will run alongside what we’ve done to find solutions, other solutions, but right now I don’t know anyone else doing this study who’ve been proven out that this technology that’s in us can be removed.
Well, I love it and I really appreciate your time today, Caroline. And again, we’ll have a link in the description if anyone wants to try it and you can get that nice little discount code as well. And yeah, I hope when the next round of studies come out, you’ll come back. We’d love to have you back and talk more about this in the future and hopefully the progress is substantial. So, thank you so much. Thank you so much for having me on. My pleasure. My name is Jesse Beltran. I’m the current president of an organization where our brand is Mind Nexus Live.
I’ve been one of the leading investigators with the phenomenon called Havana syndrome or anomalous health incidences. I have been covering this since 2010. I am currently a certified technical counter surveillance measures expert. I have been the lead in doing what is called nonlinear junction scanning on individuals and this process started in the United States initially starts with an RF detection and then we verify it with a nonlinear junction depending on our findings and basically what we’re finding is those who are symptomatic were lighting up at very specific focal areas around the human body and coming up positive for whatever reason for semiconductive or silicon-based materials in those areas.
And that’s what the nonlinear junction detector is designed to do. And we recently started a study where we’re testing non-symptomatic individuals here in the United Kingdom. They are also lighting up in those same areas as the symptomatic individuals. And that had not been the case prior to that jab. Prior to the jab, those who are non-symptomatic almost 100% of the time came up negative. They were coming up pretty much what I would expect a symptomatic person to come up positive. Very high a lot of areas around the human body hitting at 100%.
Where the nonlinear junction detection indicated there was silicon-based materials. They had been put on a test basis or a trial basis of zeolites or the masterpiece product and quite frankly I was really surprised coming here and doing the secondary exam on these individuals who participated in the testing. There was significant reduction in the areas that were lighting up. So the results have been absolutely phenomenal and actually better than we could ever have expected. An average reduction across the board so far and we’ve got one more day of test results coming in of 80% reduction of these radio frequencies coming off people’s bodies.
We’ve had personal reductions of some people 98%. But on the whole it’s around about an 80% reduction. This is unprecedented because usually in clinical studies if you were to get a 30% reduction that is something that people are very happy to see. This is why for the first time in 20 years, 15 years specifically, out in the public that I’ve supported anything out there. And so this is quite promising. Yesterday was very emotional for me because I never thought that I would see this. I can tell you 100% of the time post-COVID I’ve not tested anyone who did not come up positive in the right left TMJ, the dorsome, occipital portion, and the base of their neck.
And for the first time after they’ve been on this trial, they are not lighting up. And we are seeing anywhere from 75 to 85% reduction in the findings. And this is quite frankly incredible. Right shoulder 95%
Opened Caroline_Mansfield_Interview_Cleaned_Transcript(1).md.Saved
preview8527 words / 164 lines / 46001 charsC:\Users\rmart\Downloads\Caroline_Mansfield_Interview_Cleaned_Transcript(1).md25
And here is supposedly Zelensky saying that Russia is intentionally targeting civilians. This looks so fake, so AI, so the locomotive engine appears to be on fire, but somehow this caused 330 human deaths.
Today in the Odesa region, the Russians once again destroyed an ordinary passenger train locomotive with a jet-powered drone. There were 340 people on the train. And whoever was operating that drone certainly could not have been unaware that the target was entirely civilian. As… pic.twitter.com/ON9HjtyuXj
— Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 13, 2026
Assuming you mean Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas, he is one of the younger and more combative members of the current House Republican conference.
Gill was born February 26, 1994, grew up on a cattle ranch in West Texas, graduated from Dartmouth College in 2016, and worked in investment banking before moving into conservative media and politics. He was elected in 2024 and has represented Texas’s 26th Congressional District since January 3, 2025. At 32, he remains among the youngest Republicans in Congress.
Politically, Gill is firmly in the MAGA / populist-conservative wing of the GOP. He has explicitly described the kind of politics he wants to practice as more aggressive or “muscular” conservatism and has cited Jim Jordan as a congressional model. He serves on high-profile committees including Judiciary and Oversight, which gives him plenty of opportunities for adversarial hearings and viral questioning.
A significant part of his rise came through conservative media. Gill founded the DC Enquirer and strongly promoted 2000 Mules, the election-fraud film made by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza, who is also Gill’s father-in-law. Critics point to Gill’s promotion of disputed 2020-election claims as evidence that he came into Congress through the activist/media side of the movement rather than through traditional Texas Republican politics.
Since entering Congress, he has intentionally generated confrontational moments. Among other things, he pushed for impeachment proceedings against federal Judge James Boasberg over rulings affecting Trump administration deportation policy, attacked Rep. Ilhan Omar and circulated a petition advocating her deportation, and has used Oversight hearings to press witnesses aggressively on abortion, SNAP spending, immigration and alleged government abuses. His supporters see that as a willingness to ask questions other Republicans avoid; opponents characterize it as deliberately provocative politics designed for social media.
One noteworthy development in 2026 is that Gill was made chairman of a new House Oversight panel called the Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing Institutional Abuses. In May, he was already using that position to investigate organizations involved in alleged abuse of birth-tourism practices. That appointment suggests House leadership considers him more than simply a freshman bomb-thrower; he is being given an institutional platform unusually quickly.
So the short characterization is: young, highly articulate, strongly Trump-aligned, media-savvy, socially conservative, immigration-hardline, and deliberately confrontational. He looks like somebody trying to build a national profile rather than simply become a long-serving district congressman.
stock here: not a huge fan of violence, and this type of fighting could really result in injury. But this guy has never been on my radar. I trained in Aikido for many years, and my Sensei was the student of Morihei Ueshiba, the founder of Aikido (often translated as “the way of life”)
Quick story: Many westerners adopt Aikido thinking that it is elegant and 95% defensive, and more like “a dance”. The Aikidoists from the main Dojo in Tokyo came to train and celebrate with us in Hawaii. They trained hard, like full on martial arts, our best blackbelts were thrown and battered and “complained” that the Tokyo blackbelts were too hard on them. There is a lesson there, maybe ask Stephen Seagal, who is amazing but also somewhat questionable.
Story pau.
Now check out this fighter, unbelievable striking power, even brutal. Even his name is brutal.
Here is a clean, well-formatted blog post draft based on your transcript. It preserves your personal story, voice, and key points while organizing it into clear sections for an engaging read.
From Skeptic to Believer: My Journey Through Science, Supernatural Experiences, and Faith
When I was younger, I was the ultimate skeptic. I was the guy who needed to see things to believe them. I thought religion was foolish, and I believed I was the sole master of my own fate.
If you told my younger self that I would eventually return to faith, I would have laughed. But after a series of undeniable experiences—from scientific evidence of the soul to personal encounters with the supernatural—everything changed. Here is how I went from complete disbelief to finding solid answers.
1. The Childhood Question That Stuck With Me
Growing up, I dealt with severe health issues. I had terrible eczema and severe asthma that put me in bed for a week every few months. Because of heavy medications, much of my childhood memory is a blur.
However, one specific moment from when I was 10 years old remains crystal clear:
I was sitting in class, completely captivated by a tree outside the window. When the teacher snapped at me and asked what I was doing, I asked him: “Where do trees come from?”
He scoffed and said someone planted it. I replied, “I get that, but if you go to the tree before that, and the tree before that, all the way back… where do trees originally come from?”
At the time, nobody had an answer for me. I didn’t know it then, but that single question about origin and existence would come full circle decades later.
2. The Evidence for the Soul: Near-Death Experiences
As a teenager, I heard about Near-Death Experiences (NDEs). Skeptics often write them off as chemical reactions in a dying brain. But a documented case involving a Dutch surgeon in 1987 completely challenged my perspective.
The surgeon had patients who died on the operating table and were brought back to life. Repeatedly, these patients described floating to the ceiling and looking down. They could recall precise details, such as which tools were handed to which nurses while they were clinically dead.
To test this scientifically, the surgeon taped specific geometric shapes—a square, a triangle, and crosses—on top of the high surgical lights where no one standing in the room could see them.
When a revived patient accurately described those exact symbols on top of the lights, it became clear: consciousness and the human soul exist independent of the physical body.
3. Paranormal Encounters and Sleep Paralysis
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, after moving to California, my family and I experienced strange occurrences in our home.
Unexplained Sightings: We later learned the previous owner had passed away in the house. Multiple family members independently saw figures or felt a distinct presence.
Physical Pressure: I experienced harrowing episodes where I would wake up in the dark, completely unable to move my chest, feeling an intense physical weight smothering me.
Unexplainable Phenomena: One evening, while checking the house, I watched a heavy, thick curtain fly straight up against the ceiling on its own—despite every door and window being completely locked.
Experiencing these unexplainable, malevolent forces firsthand forced me to recognize that the spiritual realm is very real.
4. Connecting the Dots: The Return to Faith
In 2014, while at a conference in Las Vegas, I listened to a speaker named Leo Severino discuss how the universe was designed.
He opened his talk with an illustration: he tracked a fallen leaf back to its branch, back to the tree before it, and back through time to trace its ultimate origin.
Instantly, my mind flashed back to my 10-year-old self sitting in that classroom asking where the first tree came from. It felt like a seed planted decades earlier had finally bloomed. The logical chain of cause and effect led to one clear conclusion: something cannot come from nothing. There is a Creator.
Shortly after, my wife and I decided to get married in the Church. Looking back, what I once thought were random coincidences—specific churches, dates, and life events—were actually steps guiding me back toward faith.
Final Thoughts
I used to think freedom meant doing whatever I wanted without accountability. But looking back at where I started versus where I am now, I realize that seeking the truth requires keeping an open mind.
Whether it is the mystery of consciousness, the mathematical necessity of a First Cause, or personal encounters with things we cannot explain, there is far more to this life than what meets the eye.
Next Steps & Discussion
Add a Call to Action: You can end your post with a question for your readers (e.g., “Have you ever had an experience that made you question what you believe? Share your thoughts in the comments below!”).
Media: If you have photos of the backyard tile, the church, or relevant graphics, you can insert them between sections to break up the text.
stock here: just the way the clouds are forming is scary.
I pulled the current material. Your west / slightly south-of-west idea is supported, and the official NHC track discussion is now essentially saying the same thing.
At 1500 UTC Aug. 13, Tropical Storm Lala was near 15.2°N, 145.5°W, moving 280° at 9 kt — almost due west, with just a small northerly component at that instant. Maximum sustained winds were 35 kt.
More importantly, NHC’s current forecast has Lala approaching near or just south of the Big Island Saturday, potentially near hurricane strength.
On the atmospheric structure, I pulled the current GFS Central Pacific 850-mb, 500-mb, 200-mb and 200–850-mb shear products. Tropical Tidbits is indeed carrying all those fields specifically for Lala/01C in the current Aug. 13 run.
What I would take from the combined setup is:
850 mb: this is the important lower-level steering layer, and the subtropical ridge north of Lala is providing a strong easterly component. That favors westward motion.
500 mb: this tells us whether the ridge is vertically deep enough to steer a strengthening cyclone. At the moment the large-scale pattern is consistent with Lala continuing generally west rather than finding an obvious weakness and recurving north.
200 mb: mainly useful here for outflow and shear, rather than track by itself. The current GFS product set explicitly includes the 200–850 mb shear field, which is what I would watch for whether Lala can vertically stack and strengthen.
NOAA’s Hawaii GeoColor loop is updating every 10 minutes, so the visible cloud motion is a very good reality check against the model fields.
So going back to your original picture: you were reading the overall pressure pattern correctly, even if technically the 1008 isobar isn’t “dragging” Lala. The broad ridge north/northeast of the cyclone is the steering mechanism.
stock here: of course nutrition and exercise works on every part of your body, at some point we will spend more time messing around with glasses, keeping them present and clean, maybe even a few types….but what if 2 minutes a day could mitigate that?
I put some screen shots below the video, to me it’s not actionable, unless it can be reviewed in a reasonable time span. 98% of all YouTube videos are way too long. I am the goldfish attention span sound bite guy.
stock here: I am trying to copy a huge list of my old archives. The real tragedy, is that, per my computer guy, Google Blogger designs their “free program” to make it hard to leave them, and thus, all the images were lost in transferring to WordPress off of Blogger.
stock here, this is quoted on one of my articles on my “archive” nukepro. I first published the “Hot Lots” in June of 2021, and keep writing articles until “they” destroyed my blog, hosted on MY paid website, into August of 2021. So I helped get the word out, it was picked up by many.
The primary global search engines include Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo! Search, DuckDuckGo, Baidu, and Yandex. They help users find web pages, images, and videos across the internet. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Major Global Search Engines
Google: The world’s top search engine with the largest index and market share.
Microsoft Bing: Microsoft’s core search engine and the second-largest worldwide.
Yahoo! Search: A widely used web portal powered by Bing technology. [1, 2]
Privacy-Focused Search Engines
DuckDuckGo: Blocks trackers and does not save search history.
Brave Search: An independent index built with a strong privacy focus.
Startpage: Delivers Google search results anonymously.
Swisscows: A family-friendly, semantic search engine based in Switzerland. [1, 2, 3]
Eco-Friendly & Alternative Indexes
Ecosia: Uses ad revenue to plant trees around the world.
Mojeek: A completely independent crawler that does not track users.
In 2021, public health agencies and major professional medical organizations in the United States shifted from initial caution to actively promoting and recommending COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant individuals.
Here are 5 key events throughout 2021 that marked this promotion and recommendation push:
CDC Preliminary Safety Study & Reassuring Guidance Update (April 2021)
Event: The New England Journal of Medicine published real-world data from the CDC’s v-safe pregnancy registry following over 35,000 pregnant individuals who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The study found no red flags or increased risks of miscarriage or complications.
Impact: Following the published data on April 23, 2021, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky publicly expressed that the agency recommended pregnant individuals get vaccinated against COVID-19, easing earlier ambiguity.
ACOG and SMFM Issue Strong Joint Recommendation (July 30, 2021)
Event: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM)—the leading medical associations for pregnancy care in the U.S.—updated their joint guidance to strongly recommend that all pregnant individuals receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
Impact: This marked a critical consensus among frontline healthcare providers, urging doctors, midwives, and OB-GYNs to proactively recommend the vaccine during prenatal visits.
CDC Issues Official Urgent Clinical Recommendation (August 11, 2021)
Event: The CDC formally updated its guidance to explicitly recommend COVID-19 vaccination for all people who were pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant.
Impact: New safety data analyzing pregnancies in early gestation showed no increased risk of miscarriage. The official stance triggered widespread public health communications and public service announcements targeted at expectant mothers.
CDC Issues Health Advisory Alert (COCA) Warning of Severe Risks (September 29, 2021)
Event: The CDC issued an urgent Health Alert Network (HAN) advisory to healthcare providers and the public emphasizing that pregnant individuals faced a significantly higher risk of severe illness, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death from COVID-19 compared to non-pregnant individuals.
Impact: The alert urgently called for increased efforts to boost vaccination rates among pregnant individuals, given that less than 31% of pregnant women had been vaccinated by late September 2021.
U.S. Surgeon General Public Campaign Push (Late Summer / Fall 2021)
Event: U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy and HHS leadership launched dedicated public service announcements, virtual town halls, and social media campaigns addressing common misperceptions about fertility and pregnancy.
Impact: Public health initiatives directly addressed vaccine hesitancy in expectant parents, emphasizing maternal-fetal protection and antibody transfer to newborns.
stock here: I’ll add some historical data, but any 5.2 EQ anywhere in Hawaii is significant. Turns out this is the largest EQ right at Lo’ihi in 100 Years. Also significant, the depth was 40km, meaning this is at the same level as the lowest levels of the combined magma chamber for Moana Loa and Kilaeua. Meaning this could be creating a much larger “port” for deep earth magma.
Lo’ihi was renamed in the height of the Jab program, especially as they started really pushing pregnant woman to inject the mRNA into their dual bodies. To be “more culturally appropriate”. Just part of the program to change people lives in as many ways as possible in order to create “great change”.
The name Kamaʻehuakanaloa is a Hawaiian language word for “glowing child of Kanaloa“, the god of the ocean.[10] This name was found in two Hawaiian mele from the 19th and early twentieth centuries based on research at the Bishop Museum and was assigned by the Hawaiʻi Board on Geographic Names in 2021 and adopted by the U.S. Geological Survey.[10][11] From 1955 to 2021 the seamount was called “Lōʻihi”, the Hawaiian word for “long”, describing its shape. The change to Kamaʻehuakanaloa was made in an effort to be more culturally appropriate given native Hawaiian traditions for naming.[12]
stock here: I had this research very early on, this is when it got fishy, disgusting. Over half the women that lost their baby did it on the day of the jab, or the next day. That was my original research. If time, I will find the spreadsheet, and send it to Mr. Johnson.
stock here: this was on my radar but just barely, no idea the damage was so bad and so long lasting…..
==================
7.8 Earthquake Creates Sinkholes On Balut Island (Philippines Epicenter Near Indonesia)
Kumander Daot 253K subscribers 71,988 views Aug 9, 2026 BALUT ISLAND TWO MONTHS ON FROM THE STRONGEST EARTHQUAKE IN A GENERATION, BALUT ISLAND IS STILL DEVASTATED. Many families are still living in tents, under tarpaulins, or outside their homes in temporary shelters, as aftershocks cause fear.
Indeed, there were two major aftershocks while I was there, and many more earth shaking events. Sitio Highlander in Batuganding is Ground Zero, with even the most well built houses collapsing.
But in Barangay Lipul on the other side of the island, an interesting phenomenon has occured – sinkholes creates where volcanic ash blew through on land, or water and rocks on the ocean…
stock here: I still can’t get to a level of comfort in using DMSO on my own body.
Hello everyone. My name is Dr. Iggerov. I am a clinical oncologist practicing since 2010 in Russia. Today we are exploring a chemical chameleon of medicine: dimethyl sulfoxide, or DMSO.
Historically, it has been pigeonholed as two things: an industrial and pharmaceutical solvent, and a cryoprotectant needed to protect cells during freezing so they are not damaged. But modern science reveals a far more complex picture.
DMSO is emerging as a multifunctional agent with three evidence-based roles. Today we will explore the substance as a powerful drug-delivery vehicle, a bidirectional immune modulator, and a differentiation-inducing agent in cancer therapy.
So, let’s start our conversation.
This is a screenshot from a well-known journal, and it shows a randomized trial of topical ascorbic acid, a type of vitamin C, dissolved in DMSO and compared with imiquimod.
Imiquimod is a well-known cream for the treatment of local skin-cancer lesions such as basal cell carcinoma. What does imiquimod do? It attracts the immune system to attack the cancer and is a recognized treatment for many superficial and small basal-cell skin cancers.
The first role of DMSO is as a supreme delivery vehicle, and this has been demonstrated in clinical practice. This is its most established and practical application.
DMSO has a unique chemical structure that allows it to carry other drugs into tissues and let them penetrate deeper.
A 2022 basal-cell carcinoma trial tested 30% vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, in 95% DMSO versus standard imiquimod cream for skin cancer.
The result was that the DMSO-delivered vitamin C solution was more effective. It was almost 90% effective for clearance of these cancers and caused far fewer side effects than the standard treatment.
Critically, it left no hyperpigmented scars. Here, DMSO was considered not to be the drug itself, but rather the enabling technology. It made a high concentration of vitamin C deliverable, effective, and cosmetically superior to standard treatment.
As we know, high concentrations of vitamin C can become not antioxidant, but pro-oxidant. I covered this in lectures on intravenous vitamin C therapy for cancers. There are many clinical trials on this nowadays, especially involving resistant cancers such as pancreatic cancer or cancers with KRAS mutations.
Second, as I already told you, DMSO is an immune modulator, and this is where it gets fascinating.
It does not simply suppress immunity. It fine-tunes it based on concentration.
At low concentrations, less than 2%, it acts as a mild immune stimulant or irritant. Researchers found that it increases the release of histamine. Histamine is associated with allergy, but it is also a protective substance involved in inflammation.
As we know, acute inflammation is one of the body’s protective mechanisms, and this might potentially be harnessed to boost certain immune therapies.
At higher concentrations, above 2%, DMSO acts as a potent anti-inflammatory and immune suppressant. It blocks key inflammatory pathways such as NF-kappa B. This is part of the basis for its FDA-approved use in interstitial cystitis, an inflammatory condition of the bladder.
There is an interesting discovery that high-dose DMSO can reprogram naïve immune cells into regulatory T cells.
In simple words, these cells are the body’s peacemakers. They calm down immunity, allergies, and autoimmune attacks in people who have autoimmune conditions.
This is the basis for preclinical research involving, for example, type 1 diabetes and autoimmune conditions such as systemic lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and even psoriasis.
What about cancer treatment?
In one study, an intravenous infusion regimen used a mixture of DMSO and sodium bicarbonate. The dosage was 500 milliliters of 40% DMSO infused intravenously.
The frequency was once daily for seven consecutive days, followed by a seven-day break, and this was repeated in cycles. In other words, one week of infusions followed by one week without infusions.
These were patients with very advanced, highly resistant cancers of the bile ducts.
The study reported reductions in pain and jaundice, meaning yellowing of the skin, as well as improved quality of life in these very advanced-stage patients.
There are some critical safety issues with this because we know that concentrations above 30%, when infused intravenously, carry a significant risk of hemolysis, meaning rupture of red blood cells due to high osmotic pressure.
The 40% concentration used in this trial was at the upper limit of what is often considered tolerable. This is, of course, a high-risk protocol requiring very careful medical supervision and monitoring for hemolysis, renal function, and other side effects such as nausea.
These IV DMSO protocols are still highly experimental, are not standardized, and should only be performed in clinical trials or clinical research centers.
I also told you that DMSO is considered a differentiation-induction agent in cancer therapy.
What does that mean?
Our normal cells are differentiated, meaning they have their own structure and function. They are highly beneficial for our body and do what they are supposed to do.
Cancer cells become less differentiated. They become more evolutionarily primitive, stop performing their normal functions, and stop obeying the body’s central mechanisms of regulation.
We want to make these cancer cells more differentiated so they are not as aggressive and become more like normal human cells.
One direction of oncology research today is differentiation therapy. Cancer cells can be immature, rapidly dividing, and nonspecialized, unlike our normal cells.
We try to use drugs to re-educate these cancer cells, forcing them to mature into more harmless cells that stop dividing.
The classic example is all-trans retinoic acid in the treatment of acute leukemia, where it can help cure this form of leukemia.
In a 2023 review, researchers compiled decades of laboratory research showing DMSO as a differentiation inducer.
For example, DMSO can force leukemic cells to mature into normally appearing neutrophil-like cells, causing them to lose their ability to proliferate, grow, and divide, thereby slowing or stopping the growth of the tumor.
It appears to work in part by upregulating tumor-suppressor genes in these cells.
That was leukemia. What about solid tumors and cancers such as sarcomas?
Studies show that DMSO can induce differentiation markers in lung cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, and sarcomas.
So DMSO is potentially a useful and inexpensive adjuvant to sensitize cancer cells to other treatments, help slow their growth, and potentially make them more vulnerable to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy.
I also mentioned interstitial cystitis, or painful bladder syndrome, for which DMSO is approved.
The formulation is a 50% DMSO solution in water called RIMSO-50.
It is introduced into the bladder through a catheter. Usually, 50 milliliters is instilled into the bladder for 15 to 30 minutes before the patient voids.
Treatment is usually performed once every one to two weeks for approximately two months, and sometimes maintenance therapy is needed.
What about safety and critical caveats?
This is not a recommendation for self-treatment.
Purity is non-negotiable. Only pharmaceutical-grade DMSO should be used medically. Industrial-grade DMSO can contain contaminants and may be dangerous.
What about side effects?
DMSO commonly produces a garlic-like smell or taste. It can cause skin irritation at high concentrations, and when high concentrations are injected intravenously, it can cause rupture of red blood cells.
There is also the generic-compound problem.
DMSO is old, inexpensive, and non-patentable. That creates a major financial disincentive for large pharmaceutical companies to fund the large-scale clinical trials needed to prove its efficacy as a primary adjuvant for cancer treatment.
That is one reason why it is not part of standard oncology protocols today.
What has been demonstrated in humans is primarily its usefulness as a drug-delivery vehicle.
There is also compelling preclinical evidence that it acts as an immune modulator and may potentially be part of differentiation therapy, but we still need large clinical trials to prove its efficacy in cancer treatment, determine the proper doses, and identify which cancers may respond best.
A few words about additional side effects and oral use.
One commonly reported effect is a garlic-like mouth taste.
There have also been clinical trials involving inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. In these studies, oral DMSO formulations containing 500 milligrams of DMSO were taken four times per day, and the studies reported a decrease in relapse rates.
I also want to underline that there are unofficial oncology protocols found on the internet that recommend taking DMSO orally.
Some suggest putting four drops of pharmaceutical-purity DMSO into water and drinking it, gradually increasing the amount to ten drops per intake as tolerated, or approximately 40 drops per day.
However, it can cause allergic reactions, stomach irritation, and discomfort in some people.
Again, oral DMSO cannot currently be recommended for cancer management because there have not been adequate clinical trials establishing its effectiveness and safety for this purpose.
That is why, officially, we cannot recommend it as oncologists.
Thanks for watching, and thank you for supporting this channel. My name is Dr. Iggerov. If you like this video, subscribe, and I will see you in the next series.
