Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Friday, July 3, 2020

Karen Tells Me to "Wear A Damn Mask", And My Studied Response


Hospitals in Imperial Valley are airlifting their excess covid patients to Sacramento. Houston has started sending covid patients to hospitals outside the city. Arizona is activating surge capacity and have moved non covid patients to other parts of the hospital (lobbies, meeting rooms etc).
People need to wear a mask. You do not know if you are an asymptomatic case at any point. Without a mask you are a risk to others because of this.
Wear a damn mask.


I was one of the earliest adopters of wearing masks, I had over 100 N95, and a few P100 and some surgical masks. I am a contractor and a prepper. I also had the COVID Jan 15th coming back from Hawaii, 2 negative tests since then. If one is not sneezing or coughing, there is VERY LITTLE chance of passing it on.
That said, I see the way they have fully over blown this (I have written dozens of stories on that, as well as advanced modeling and charting) is that it is part of a plot to keep people as scared as possible. Just look at the new HCQ studies that now prove it is very effective. 

It's a plot, designed to get people to be snitches, to be willing to give up their rights, to muzzle themselves, to be submissive, and BONUS to get rid of Trump. Well I don't like any of those, so if I was in a true hot spot, I probably wouldn't go out at all and would use a mask if out.

Also, my calc is about 20% to achieve herd immunity. It is a crime that the kids were not sent back to school around April 15th or 20th. The kids are our best vaccine. This is SARS-2 (COVID is a code name to make it even scarier and to keep the knowledge in select hands that as SARS-2, we know a lot about it). 
Fauci was total misdirection stating that we "are in unchartered waters." Another tell. 
They tried many vaccines for SARS-1 and tested up to primate level, obviously too dangerous to just test on humans. The primates had around 20% horrible reaction when re-challenged with the virus, the immune system went into over drive and only critical medical care could save them, although most were left to die to be autopsied.

Thus, there is very little chance that there will be a vaccine. Everyone in the know, knows this. So you have to ask yourself, why are they playing this game? They consider it a game, to them, your life is just part of a game, "a higher loyalty to a larger plan".

And that is why unless mandated by a store (I try to boycott but sometimes need Costco or Menards) I will not wear a mask again, unless my local conditions change drastically. 
The original article from one of my favorite Anti-nuclear activists who never gives up, Libbe HaLevy
RETIRED SURGEON Sam Laucks, has this to say about wearing masks:
“OK, here’s my rant about masks:
I have spent the past 39 years working in the field of surgery. For a significant part of that time, I have worn a mask. I have worked with hundreds (probably thousands) of colleagues during those years, who have also worn masks. Not a single one us of became ill, passed out or died from lack of oxygen. Not a single one of us became ill, passed out or died from breathing too much carbon dioxide. Not a single one us of became ill, passed out or died from rebreathing a little of our own exhaled air. Let’s begin here by putting those scare tactics to rest!
(It is true that some people, with advanced lung diseases, may be so fragile that a mask could make their already-tenuous breathing more difficult. If your lungs are that bad, you probably shouldn’t be going out in public at the present time anyway; the consequences if you are exposed to Covid-19 would likely be devastating.)
~ “But”, you ask, “can’t viruses go right through the mask, because they are so small?” (“Masks keep viruses out just as well as a chain link fence keeps mosquitoes out,” some tell us.) It is true that individual virus particles can pass through the pores of a mask; however, viruses don’t move on their own. They do not fly across the room like a mosquito, wiggle through your mask like a worm, or fly up your nose like a gnat. The virus is essentially nothing more than a tiny blob of genetic material. Covid-19 travels in a CARRIER – the carrier is a fluid droplet- fluid droplets that you expel when you cough, sneeze, sing, laugh, talk or simply exhale. 
Most of your fluid droplets will be stopped from entering the air in the room if you are wearing a mask. Wearing a mask is a very efficient way to protect others if you are carrying the virus (even if you don’t know that you are infected). In addition, if someone else’s fluid droplets happen to land on your mask, many of them will not pass through. This gives the wearer some additional protection, too. But, the main reason to wear a mask is to PROTECT OTHERS. Even if you don’t care about yourself, wear your mask to protect your neighbors, co-workers and friends!
~ A mask is certainly not 100% protective. However, it appears that the severity of Covid-19 infection is at least partially “dose-dependent.” In other words, the more virus particles that enter your body, the sicker you are likely to become. Why not decrease that volume if you can? “What have you got to lose?!”
~ “But doesn’t a requirement or a request to wear a mask violate my constitutional rights?” You’re also not allowed to go into the grocery store if you are not wearing pants. You can’t yell “fire” in the Produce Department. You’re not allowed to urinate on the floor in the Frozen Food Section. Do you object to those restrictions? Rules, established for the common good, are component of a civilized society.
~ “But aren’t masks uncomfortable?” Some would say that underwear or shoes can be uncomfortable, but we still wear them. (Actually, being on a ventilator is pretty darned uncomfortable, too!) Are masks really so bad that you can’t tolerate them, even if they will help keep others healthy?
~ “But won’t people think I’m a snowflake or a wimp if I wear a mask?” I hope you have enough self-confidence to overcome that.
~ “But won’t I look stupid if I wear a mask?” I’ve decided not to dignify that question with an answer!! πŸ“·:)
~ “But I never get sick; I’m not worried.” Well, then, wear a mask for the sake of the rest of us who are not so perfect!
There is good evidence that masks make a real difference in diminishing the transmission of Covid-19. Please, for the sake of others (and for the sake of yourself), wear your mask when in public. It won’t kill you!
P.S. - And, by the way, please be sure that BOTH your nose and mouth are covered!
Recommendations around mask usage are confusing. The science isn't. Evidence shows that masks are extremely effective to slow the coronavirus and may be the best tool available right now to fight it.”

Harvard Girl, Who Wanted to Stab Supporters of 'All Lives Matter'. Now Crying

Harvard girl wanted to taunt victims after she stabbed them and watched them bleed out.

She did a video and put it on the internet.   The original is at the bottom.

Now she lost her job.

Now she is sad because Trump Supporter came for her life.

Just a Joke
Original Death Threat Tweet

Epstein Island Flight Log List of Names

I hope this is a useable format. Someone on VOAT suggested a method of "Promoting" those who visited Little Saint James.

Adam Perry Lang
Akon (Aliaune Damala Badara Akon Thiam)
Alan Dershowitz
Alberto Pinto
Alec Baldwin
Alyssa Rogers
Anderson Cooper
Andrea Mitrovich
Andres Pastrana (for Columbia president)
Anthony Kiedis
Audrey Raimbault
Barak Obama
Ben Affleck
Beyonce Knowles
Bill Clinton
Bill Hammand
Bill Murray
Brian Affieck
Caren Casey
Casey Wasserman
Charlie Sheen
Chelsea Handler
Chris Tucker
Chris Wagner
Chrissy Teigen
Cindy Lopez
Claire Hazel
Courtney Love
Dan Schneider
David Koch
David Yarovesky (Yarvo!)
Demi Moore
Doug Band
Ed Tuttle
Ehud Barak
Ellen Spencer
Emmy Tayler
Fleur Perry Lang
Freya Wissing
Gary Roxburgh
Ghislaine Maxwell
Glen Dubin
Greg Holbert
Gwen Stefani
Gwendolyn Beck
Hank Collier
Heather Mann
Henry Rosovsky
James Franco
James Gunn
Jean Luc Brunel
Jean Michelle Gathy
Jeffery Epstein
Jeffery Jones
Jeffrey Epstein
Jim Carrey
Jimmy Kimmel
Joe pagino
John Cusack
John Legend
Juan Pablo Molyneux
Juliette Bryant
Justin Rolland
Kathy Griffin
Katy Perry (Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson)
Kelly Spamm
Kevin Spacey
Kirsty Rodgers
Larry Summers
Larry Visoski
Laura Wasserman
Lawrence Krauss
Linda Pinto
Lisa Summers
Lynn Forester De Rothchild
Madonna Ciccone
Mandy Ellison
Marc Collins-Rector
Mark Epstein
Mark Lioyd
Marshall Matthers III
Melinda Luntz
Meryl Streep
Michelle Wolf
Naiomi Campbell
Natalie Blachon(De Perrier)
Nicole Junkermann
Oliver Sachs
Oprah Winfrey
Paul Hala
Paul Mellon
Paula Epstein
Peter Marino
Pharrel Williams
Quentin Tarantino
Ralph Ellison
Ray Barzanna
Ricardo Legoretta
Robert Downey Jr
Rodney Slater
Ron Burke
Sandy Burger
Sarah Kellen
Seth Green
Shawn Carter
Shelley Harrison
Shelley Lewis
Sophie Biddle
Stefani Germanotta
Stephen Collins
Steven Colbert
Steven Spielberg
Steven Tyler
Svetlana Griaznova
Teala Davies
Tiffany Gramza
Tom Hanks
Tom Pritzker
Tyler Grasham
Victor Salva
Virginia Roberts (currently why he was arrested)
Wanda Sykes
Will Ferrell
Will Smith
Woody Allen

Murder by Vent: Undercover Nurse Reveals Horrific "Treatment" Of Patients At Elmhurst Hospital

In this video provided by "Deep State Exposed,"

A nurse, with 20 years experience, deeply disturbed with what she has been witnessing in Elmhurst Hospital, Queens NY, sheds light on some very important hot topics and questions held by the public. Undercover, she exposes and creates adjective record of some of the most horrific atrocities within the Hospital. She describes the staff, as a stoned cold, emotionless "collective," lacking any degree of individualism.

Were ventilators ever the right approach for treating C0V!D!9?
We have learned that 60 - 90 % "Vented" Do Not Survive.

Why, the disproportionate number of cov!d deaths among Americans of color?

The Distortion surrounding D-N-R Orders.

The Complete disregard for P-P-E Standards and the clustering of c0v!d positive and c0v!d negative patients witnessed again and again.

This video is alarming. A great illustration of why the government, should not be dictating our healthcare. Obamacare has got to go, and the Staff at Elmhurst should be imprisoned.

Stay tuned for part two

Thursday, July 2, 2020

Murder by Lockdown: Deaths Time "Perfectly" With Start Of Lockdown, 13 Countries Intense Charts!

stock here.   Weeks back I described to a female friend how the Government had intentionally stuff COVID positive people into nursing homes.   She was shocked as in "Why would they ever do that!?".     My answer visibly shocked her even worse....."because they needed the deaths".....

This is some top level work.    I would say at least 8 hours of work.  

Shall we brand John Pospichal as a hero of Citizen Journalism?   I say yes.


And Jon Rappoport, also chimes in with salient points.   These are at the far bottom to keep focus on the primary author.

Questions for lockdown apologists

We now have mortality data for the first few months of 2020 for many countries, and, as you might expect, there were steep increases associated with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in each one.
Surprisingly, however, these increases did not begin before the lockdowns were imposed, but after. Moreover, in almost every case, they began immediately after. Often, mortality numbers were on a downward trend before suddenly reversing course after lockdowns were decreed.
This is an astonishing finding. But before I discuss its full import, and pose some questions to those who still defend the utility of lockdowns, I want to present the data that proves it.
Here’s a series of charts by the Financial Times showing overall mortality and “deaths in excess of normal levels” in 2020 for a number of countries:

Source. Note: I removed the chart in the bottom right corner which represented “13 countries/cities combined” and replaced it with the FT chart for New York City.

As you can see, in every country there were significant increases in overall mortality beginning some time in February or March.
Now let’s add the lockdown dates in green for each country:

You will notice that only after each country (or city) was locked down did the increases begin. Moreover, they began immediately, and in nearly every case, precipitously.
Now let’s examine the data for a few of these countries and cities in greater detail.
The Economist has published its own series of charts showing excess deaths in several countries. Here’s its chart for Belgium:

Note: The Economist’s charts are interactive in the source.

The national lockdown is shown to have occurred on March 18th. But that was only Phase 2 of the national lockdown. Phase 1, which included widespread business closures, began on March 13th.
Their chart, therefore, should really look like this:

Which shows no increase in mortality before the lockdown, and then an immediate and precipitous increase after it was imposed.
The Netherlands
Here’s The Economist’s chart for the Netherlands:

In a strange oversight, the lockdown that was declared on March 15 in that country is not indicated here. Moreover, the March 23rd “ban on public gatherings” shown in the chart was simply the bolstering of an already-existing ban on public gatherings that had been issued on March 12 (which was accompanied by the lockdown of nursing homes). The Dutch lockdown, therefore, began on March 12, escalated on March 15, and peaked on March 23.
Let’s add that information to the chart:

Once again, we see no significant increase in mortality before the start of the lockdown, and then an immediate, precipitous increase once the lockdown began.
(Note: The slightest increase in mortality is still observable immediately before the “Lockdown phase 1” line, but that is probably due to the fact that the Netherlands reports its mortality data on a weekly, rather than a daily basis, and March 12th (“Lockdown phase 1”) fell in the middle of the week. If we had daily data, we would probably be able to confirm that there was no increase at all prior to March 12th.)
Let’s move on to some larger countries.
Here’s The Economist’s chart for Spain:

Note that most of the excess deaths came from the Madrid region.
Here’s a chart I made of overall mortality in the Madrid region using the same data The Economist used (available here). Notice the steep rise in deaths beginning around March 9th:

Now let’s add the major lockdown orders to this chart:

Red text denotes lockdown orders limited to the Madrid region; purple text denotes lockdown orders affecting the entire nation. I compiled this information from news reports.

You will observe here the same peculiar phenomenon we’ve observed thus far: significant rises in mortality do not pre-date major lockdown events, but rather coincide with them, or follow them very closely.
Next up, Britain.

The Economist draws the “National lockdown” line on Mar 23. But again, that was only Phase 2 of the lockdown. Phase 1 began on March 20.
Many of the excess deaths occurred in London. Let’s take a closer look at that data:

As you can see from this chart (created using The Economist’s own data set), there was no significant increase in deaths before March 20, and no increase at all before March 13.
Now let’s add the lockdown dates:

And we see the same phenomenon here as elsewhere— namely, no increase in overall mortality until after the lockdowns begin, and then a sudden, precipitous rise.

In Italy, the largest increase in deaths occurred in the Lombardy region. Let’s look closer at that data, and also plot the regional lockdown on February 22.

Once again: the sudden, precipitous increase in deaths followed the lockdown.

The greatest increase in deaths came from the Paris region, so let’s take a closer look at that data:

Again, the same phenomenon is evident here as elsewhere: no significant increase in deaths until after the lockdown was declared, and then an immediate, precipitous rise.
New York City

Here, the “City lockdown” is shown to have occurred on March 22.
But let’s take a closer look. Here is the same data overlaid with lockdown orders:

Purple text denotes state-level orders, red text city-level orders.

Now it’s very clear: there was no increase in deaths before the start of lockdowns.
(Note: I plotted the state lockdown on Mar 20, which is when it was announced and went into partial effect.)
Let’s take a look at one more case.
A severe national lockdown was decreed in Ecuador on March 16th, and went into effect on March 17th. The Guayas province, which contains Ecuador’s most populous city, suffered the highest rate of overall mortality. Here’s the mortality chart (from the Financial Times) for that region:

And here’s a closer look:


As with all the other cases we’ve examined here — and as with all the countries and cities for which we have good mortality data — only after the lockdown began was there a significant increase in deaths.
All this leads us to the following questions, which we pose to all those who continue to defend the use of lockdowns as an effective means to prevent excess deaths.
Q: Why was there no significant increase in overall mortality, in any country we have good data for, before the start of lockdowns?
Q: Why does a precise and exact correlation exist between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality?
Q: How is it that governments in every country imposed lockdowns at precisely the same time relative to the future precipitous rise in their populations’ overall mortality rate?
Q: How is it, moreover, that this moment in time happened to fall immediately before that precipitous rise?

Most attempts to answer these questions would probably involve the assertion that the authorities in every country had some notion of the true prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic. But we know now that that was not really the case. In the early weeks and months of 2020, testing was extremely limited. This was based, partly, on the assumption that the virus was not yet widespread. As testing was systematically expanded, the number of positive results increased, and this increase was generally believed to correspond to the actual spread of the virus.

Now, posthumous testing has shown that the virus was circulating — and killing — weeks, or even months before it was initially detected in many countries. Other researchers are coming to the same conclusion; the prevalence of the virus was vastly underestimated at the beginning of the pandemic.
Which leads us to our final question:

Q: If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?

—To that last question, I would respond: No virus would wait. We’re not talking about a virus at all. We’re talking about the sudden effects of the lockdowns.
And those sudden death-effects would come crashing down, first, and immediately, on the most vulnerable people in these countries:
The elderly, who were already ill for years.
Especially in nursing homes; but also in hospitals, and in their homes.
This is the true face of “COVID.”

This is how the case numbers and the death numbers are being propped up all over the world, to yield the impression of a virus on the loose.
Without those huge numbers, the whole vicious charade of a pandemic would be exposed and rejected at once.
The lockdowns are a method of killing.
The governors and mayors and presidents and prime ministers who imposed the lockdowns—and behind them, the planners of “COVID”— have been killing old people

Arrest of Ghislane Maxwell, Cabal Pretends That Is Going To Be Bad News For Trump

There is some BS going around that the arrest of GM is going to be a big negative for Trump.

Maybe for the "base" who does not question anything......

This interview with a Prosecutor for Epstein, indicates how Trump willingly discussed everything the DOJ wanted to know about Epstein in 2009.   No skeletons in the closet.

CNN Needs to Be Shut Down

Ghislaine Maxwell ARRESTED by FBI! False Flag Shooting In A Lib City Coming Soon!

One final important thought though, and I don’t want  you to miss it, because it involves a likely upcoming mass shooting, and likely in one of “our cities”.   Within 24 to 48 hours, in order to take over the news cycle.   Milwaukee, Philadelphia, LA, Seattle, Portland, St. Louis are the top picks.   

The above is speculation, None of the below is speculation, and even the super Establishment “The Guardian” is not even trying to spin down this story into something smaller than what it is.   The rabbit hole runs deep. 

Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested today.    She was the Madam that befriended and psy-oped underage girls to become sex (pretty much slaves) for Jeffrey Epstein and all of his guests.     Epstein hosted the rich and powerful, he worked with CIA and Israel CIA (MOSSAD) to blackmail them, while also rewarding them.    80% of the crime and corruption in the USA and beyond, think Prince Andrew, is likely linked to the sexual hijinks at Little Saint James Island and other Mansions, filmed and blackmailed.

Epstein was  murdered while in jail.    Maxwell was linked directly CIA/MOSSAD via her rich father, who was murdered.    She knows even more than Epstein about “where the bodies are buried”.   The charges against her are pretty much a life sentence, so likely she will cooperate to get a plea.    So the super rich/super corrupt are going to be panicking

Steve out