Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Saturday, August 13, 2016

IAEA International Atomic Energy Association Is Now Telling Doctors To Downplay Radiation Concerns in a Disaster

"If we can assist medical personnel in communicating effectively with the affected population......"

Ah, now the pimps for International Radiation are guiding Doctors on who to sell propaganda to their patients and society overall.   

You can get the full download here 

Incredibly they give primary thanks to the famous Dr Yamashita, the asshat criminal lying "Doctor" who told people on video that if they smiled that Fukushima could not hurt them.

Then as they shift into a mode of downplaying radiation by presenting and promoting the "Hormesis Theory" that radiation is actually good for you.

But amazingly, on page 40, they present this quote from Ann Coulter, AND THEY FAIL TO RECOGNIZE that this is a prime example of why people do not trust the media and the lying Doctors like Yamashita....because when people perceive obvious lies being thrown at them, they look at any "communication" with suspicion.

They continue on with the promotion of hormesis, somewhat presenting "both sides" but they control the narrative by a false argument of limited choices.    One must either be a true believer of hormesis, OR one must be a LNT follower (Linear No Threshold).     Read it on Page 34.

Then amazingly they actually write this as a Conclusion---P 36

This has been illuminated by the cultural and historical discourse of radiation health effects, which have affected and continue to affect the alleged objectivity of scientific definitions of disease and illness. Care must be taken to avoid medicalization of conditions in defining contested diseases because of possible inadvertent implications in social and medical policy. At the same time the leveling or trivialization of potential health risks from radiation for the sake of political or public interests should be avoided in the interest of potentially affected individuals.
What they are attempting to persuade with is "because radiation has been looked at poorly in the past, therefore you Doctors need to question your own objectivity, especially as it relates to "medicalization".     Amazingly the IAEA coins there own term Medicalization, and then goes on to define that as "over diagnosing illness".     They pretend that some sicknesses are "just the way it is" and you should just accept it as that, and not lump it against radiation.

Seriously, that is their tactic---pretend that sickness and disease, IS NOT sickness and disease.  
Then they throw out these insanely offbase examples, with the first example pretending that only "acute radiation syndrome" can be called a "disease".   The absurdity of it all.   Just read these and shake your head.  P29
This "breakout" on P32 seems to be trying to brainwash Doctors to the idea that if something is not recognized as a disease, that is OK, especially if that is in the "national interest"

On page 42, they layout their plan for the propaganda quite clearly
On Page 43 they attempt to deal with "public rejection of radiation risk"

But on P45, they sum it up pretty well---

Radiation risks represent a class of environmental risks over which people feel a particular lack of control (Slovic 1996), and particularly those associated with exposures following accidents. The public is dependent on information from authorities or media, and has little personal choice or control over the situation. The public has to deal with the risks from the exposure and in addition they must cope with the effects of the measures imposed to reduce exposure such as relocation, bans on agriculture or access to amenities. The latter represent
decisions taken at central level. They are disruptive and infringe upon liberty and free choice.


But the lies and propaganda just keep rolling, review this from P49

 Then on P53 they get into "genetic testing",  how convenient, even if the cancer was caused by radiation, they can blame it firstly on genetics and "bad luck".   Please read it yourself.

Then on Page 55 they have an Exercise.    It seems like a fun game in which you have total control in decided who stays in a fallout shelter after a nuclear war, and who gets forced out into the radiation.    What lesson do you think the IAEA is trying to push?   That forcing people into radiation is normal and necessary.     Read it.


  1. Putting out propaganda is business as usual for the radiation cartel. That's about all you hear from them, anything but the truth.

    The reality is that the true facts on radiation toxicity have been carefully obfuscated for ages by all nations committed to nuclear energy, medical radiation, and nuclear weaponry, such as the US, France, Russia, India, or Japan.

    The conventional medical-dental industries and the nuclear-military industries (=the radiation cartel) have been, for well over half a century , perpetually lying about, and minimizing, the true toxicity of ionizing radiation (e.g resorting to false sneaky comparisons between radiation exposure from sunlight or an airplane flight, etc. to deliberately deceive the unwitting public) to avoid culpability for the huge number of deaths and injuries that they're responsible for (discussed and well referenced in "The Mammogram Myth" by Rolf Hefti).

    The official accounts on the Chernobyl debacle, as an example, range from a few dozen to a few hundred people who ended up dead while independent analyses (conducted by people NOT tied to the mainstream "science" syndicate) estimated the death toll in the tens to hundreds of thousands (in some cases approaching a million) of deceased people (and the radiation cartel-induced massacre is continuing).

    The distortions and disinformation about the alleged safety of (low dose) radiation or the purported lack of much harm to people, whether from medical x-rays or fallout from disaster sites such as Chernobyl or Fukushima, continues to this day. The real danger and damage caused by Chernobyl and Fukushima are much higher than the officialdom wants the public to believe.

    You can recognize the global grip of this powerful big money cartel by the ominous absence in the reporting of the allied mass media about the ongoing severe disaster at Fukushima, or any of the solid proof of the fraud this criminal cartel is involved in.

    1. Yep, their early "capture" of the WHO speaks volumes

  2. I guarantee that when I begin to speak about radiation and produce this information, eyes will roll and the subject will change.

    1. ya Michelle its a tough call, you may awaken some people, but others will just think you are weird. Send them a card when they have cancer, ouch.


Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments