We need a "Technological Bill of Rights".
Note the structure of the first sentence. It is intentionally ambiguous, so that later they could back peddle and say we meant the "attraction towards minors" was supposed to only be permitted as a phenomenon.
So clearly we have Twitter aiding and abetting child abuse, purportedly as an aid to increase the deviancy of the public as well as creating "damaged goods"
No one with an 8th grade reading and writing level could be this sloppy on leaving these gaps in language, unless it was intentional.