stock here - I will admit, I am a bit dense. Until I saw USGS debris analysis data from 911 showing extreme amounts of ionizing radiation, I did not believe the 911 conspiracy.
But once I saw that data, and did a Deep Dive, the truth became clear, 911 was allowed to happen and they brought the building down by controlled explosions. It's all out there, and it is beyond the point of even arguing about.
So for half a decade now, I have been hearing from the USA in some tricky swap a roo, is effectively usurped by a Corporation in control.
The guest poster who provided the following guides......
This is difficult, complex, stuff.It will not become clear in one seating.This is a starting point.
Perhaps I shall start today.
Dear friends and correspondents,
A triptych of topics follow.
1.0 INTRODUCTORY TOPIC
I invite you to view and listen to an interview (about 30 minutes) of Anna Von Reitz (AVR). Robert David Steele (RDS), former spy with a cherubic face, interviewed her with a humble posture, presenting as he did a grandmother who knows whereof she speaks!
Kathleen Stillwell posted a piece authored by RDS on Truth Comes to Light, a welcoming INN [information network node] along the Internet Highway.
Anna von Reitz is one of a tiny handful of true experts on the Deep State’s use of corrupted law and language to undermine the sovereignty and prosperity of We the People of the land.
Anna von Reitz discusses the fundamentals of the fraudulent variations of the US Government actually controlled by the Vatican and Great Britain and announces how State Assemblies have been called into session in each one of the 50 states.
The bottom line is that We the People of the land, on the land, are the sovereign individuals and title holders who are able to renounce, reject, and render null and void all absentee landlord claims.
She addresses the unlawful conversion that has taken place in the past – in effect human trafficking – in which the individuals have been unlawfully converted into “human capital."
The War of Secession (the South seeking its lawful right to succeed) and Civil War (the North illegally seeking to hold the South in bondage so as to loot it) are discussed.
The failure of the US Government to live up to the ends of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is discussed.
The US Government is its present form is more like a prison guard and factory owner harvesting wealth from the people rather than protecting the health and wealth of the people.
This is difficult, complex, stuff.
It will not become clear in one seating.
This is a starting point.
ACD COMMENT TO POST ABOVE:
Thank you! As an INN [information network node] along the Internet Highway, Truth Comes to Light does great service to its readers passing on Mr. Steele's interview with Anna Von Reitz. This site offers more data on topics discussed: www[dot]annavonreitz[dot]com. The seeming "difficulty", "complexity" are due to our ignorance and the fraud perpetrated on us. We can rectify both deficiencies.
Kathleen Stillwell, mistress of Truth Comes to Light, had this editorial comment at the start of her post.
TCTL editor’s note: Please understand that this is not legal advice. Legal advice will never be given on this website. This is offered as a potential tool for your use wherein you take full responsibility for the outcome of your actions. This is a complex subject. This interview is just a brief intro into the work of Anna and others on this subject. It will take study to decide if this is a path you’ll want to engage in. Please do your own research and trust yourself when reading and when giving consideration to anything that appears here or anywhere else. Like many readers here, I’ve looked at this material for years and explored many avenues. Personally, I’d rather just reboot the entire world and free it of all entrenched systems. I’ll continue to share anything that supports personal freedom and responsibility. ~ Kathleen
Kathleen's comment about "rebooting" the entire world, thus to "free it of all entrenched systems" deserves attention and much more thought than I can give here in passing. The analogy to (personal) computers may suffice: You can reboot and free your machine of unwanted glitches, snafus, and electronic miscreants in RAM, but you sure as hell will not, and do not desire to, "free it of all entrenched systems"! Unless, of course, you enjoy reinstalling entire operating systems, which I understand those who run various LINUX distributions do [e.g., Ubuntu]! For a deeper dive into this rabbit hole, I recommend your reading Miles Mathis' papers dealing with Phoenicians and their strategy for world dominance, which continues to unfold and demonstrably achieve success to this, our day in the sun, FROM WITHIN SYSTEMS!
2.0 TO ASSUME OR NOT TO ASSUME [The Quest I on]
I insert here an edited communication I sent to some of you previously. It serves, I think, as a useful predicate to 3.0, below.
[A PREFACATORY INTERJECTION: Simply, in logic and law -- you'll get the joke in a minute -- predicate means that which is said concerning the subject. In a logical proposition; as, “The law is the perfection of common sense.” “Perfection of common sense,” being affirmed concerning the law, (the subject) is the predicate or thing predicated. Wharton; Bourland v. Hildreth, 26 Cal. 232. ACD Q.: How often do you see a LIE employed to define the meaning of a "simple" word like predicate?]
I remember to this day an admonition, "To ASSUME can make an ASS of U and ME." I later received a series of painful lessons as a senior manager of professional staff from a man who lent his name, to this day, to the dangerous habit of "assuming" (i.e., "Peter Walsh Syndrome"). Therefore, revisiting the notion of "assuming" in the context of COVID seems apropos and worthy of repetition.
COVID remains a large gem in the tiara of tyranny, still under development. Ayn Rand -- born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum (February 2, [O.S. January 20] 1905 - March 6, 1982) and raised in Russia -- held me enthralled during late adolescence, in particular, with the novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Having arrived in the embryonic USSA in 1926, Ayn Rand deeply impressed upon me, then an aspiring scientist, one admonition: CHECK YOUR PREMISES!
Here's a "list of assumptions" useful in checking your premises as they may relate to COVID.
Assumption 1: The Method of Counting COVID Deaths is Sensible and Accurate
Assumption 2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate
Assumption 3: The Antibody Test for COVID is Accurate
Assumption 4: The COVID Case Count is Rising
Assumption 5: Thermal Imaging/Screening for COVID is Effective
Assumption 6: Asymptomatic People Can Spread the Disease
Assumption 7: Making Schools Adopt Insanely Restrictive Measures Will Stop COVID Spread
Assumption 8: It’s a Good Idea for Government to Take|Abduct Kids from COVID-Positive Parents
Assumption 9: Social Distancing is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence
Assumption 10: Mask Wearing for Healthy People is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence
Assumption 11: We Live in a World of Indiscriminate Killer Viruses
In discussing COVID and derivative issues with another person, one might first compare (a) which assumptions both agree hold and (b) which assumptions each agrees to disagree. Any disagreement about assumptions deserves highest priority for initial discussion! Otherwise, we can talk in circles forever, never finding and taking tangents leading to better, mutual understanding, to Truth of the matter, and to The American Way (so to write).
One might also bear in mind distinctions between STRONG and WEAK assumptions. For any kind of argument, a strong assumption is like a cornerstone or foundation. If a strong assumption does not hold, or is shown invalid or unreliable (that is, imprecise, degree of uncertainty substantial in application), then the entirety of the argument FAILS. If a weak assumption proves so (invalid, unreliable), then the argument may retain integrity, albeit sans the assumption one now has to abandon. For example, that COVID actually exists, whether man-made or natural, is a STRONG ASSUMPTION underlying Assumptions 1 through 3 above. Whether or not wearing a mask is healthy or unhealthy, effective or ineffective, is a WEAK assumption, as are Assumptions 7 and 9.
As a scientist with a basic medical education -- specifically, Pharmacology and related subjects (e.g., vaccines as "drugs", virology, histochemistry, biochemistry, immunology -- I myself call into question the existence of a "COVID-19 entity". Willing for the sake of argument to assume the existence of the supposed "corona virus", I challenge Assumptions 1 through 3 as listed above. If you and I, therefore, cannot agree on those foundational assumptions, then we have no business wasting each other's time trying to argue issues pertaining to subordinate assumptions!