Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Monday, July 6, 2020

Corona Cirus COVID, Is There Really a New Virus, Or Is It All Concoted?

The "science" behind the new virus is shaky at best

Reader submitted

This can apply to all "viruses" but this is specifically in regards to "Coronavirus:"
There is NO PROOF of a purified/isolated "Coronavirus" that fulfills Koch's Postulates:

This is from the FDA emergency use authorization of the PCR test:
"DETECTION OF VIRAL RNA MAY NOT INDICATE THE PRESENCE OF INFECTIOUS VIRUS OR THAT 2019-nCoV IS THE CAUSATIVE AGENT for clinical symptoms.

• The PERFORMANCE OF THIS TEST HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.

• The performance of this test has not been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-nCoV.

• THIS TEST CANNOT RULE OUT DISEASES CAUSED BY OTHER BACTERIAL OR VIRAL PATHOGENS."

AND:
"SINCE NO QUANTIFIED VIRUS ISOLATES OF THE 2019-nCoV ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/┬ÁL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a
suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) TO MIMIC CLINICAL SPECIMEN."
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/downloadved2ahUKEwjskcuw77jqAhUBB50JHf6LAcYQFjABegQIBxAC&usg=AOvVaw26_v3GqAn8Y9-F3w81SSQR

Admittance that no "virus" isolate is available and they must concoct something to mimic it, that the test can not rule out other causes of disease, and that a positive test does not mean what is detected is causing disease.

From the original "Covid-19" study:

Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020

Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, NOT PURIFIED ONES.”
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
"ALTHOUGH OUR STUDY DOES NOT FULFILL KOCH'S’ POSTULATES,"

Admittance by original "Coronavirus" researchers that they did not fulfill Koch's Postulates and therefore did not prove the "virus" exists at all.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

Why Koch's Postulates matter:

Explanation by David Crowe

"Koch’s postulates are a STATEMENT OF FOUR LOGICAL RULES FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A PATHOGEN EXISTS AND IS THE CAUSE OF A DISEASE (e.g. [Cann 1997]). THEY MUST BE SATISFIED before it can be accepted that a pathogen causes a disease. They state
that:

1. The pathogen must be present in every case of the disease.
2. It must be isolated from the host and grown in vitro (culture).
3. The disease must be reproduced when a pure culture of the pathogen is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host.

4. The same agent must be isolated once again from the experimentally infected host

Koch’s postulates are merely a STATEMENT OF THE MINIMAL EVIDENCE NECESSARY to
have confidence in the existence of a pathogen and its causal link to a disease. It is important to note that THESE POSTULATES ARE not based on experimental evidence, but on SIMPLE LOGIC."
There is no valid evidence of a purified/isolated "virus" that fulfills Koch's Postulates.
We have been lied to over and over again.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments