Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Thursday, October 8, 2020

Remember Nov 1 2018, FBI's Wray Pretended The Fake Bombs Were Real Bombs? Why Wasn't He Fired Then?

stock here: The 2018 Fraud may have swung the house to the Democrats. It was obvious these were "fake bombs". 

Now Wray is slow walking information on Biden, actually stonewalling.


And somehow Blogger has removed my articles written back then. I can't find any of them. -----------------------------------

As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy noted, if the mailed IED devices were “functionally explosive” they would fall under the category “weapons of mass destruction” [defined here by U.S. code] and the indictment would include 18 US Code 2332a [SEE HERE] The absence of this charge infers the devices were not functionally explosive. The pattern within the indictment in combination with the comments from the DOJ and FBI seems odd; and, in my humble opinion, rather political in nature from the perspective of FBI Director Christopher Wray (whom I think is extremely sketchy). In other words, Sayoc wasn’t charged with sending explosive devices for the simple reason that the fake pipe bombs did not contain explosives.

They contained “energetic material,” according to FBI Director Wray, a definition that applies to anything since all matter is energy according to Einstein’s E=MC(squared). FBI Director Wray, in other words, is deliberately deceiving the American public.

 So what else is new? Isn’t it also interesting that Wray’s false claim fits right into the anti-Trump narrative of the dishonest lying media?



  1. Remember during 9-11 the NYC area head of the FBI appeared with his arm in sling and was replaced immediately, and with no notice, by some stranger to handle 9-11 destruction of 3 skyscrapers?

    1. Why hasn't a single person on MSM pointed out that Mueller was appointed 1 week before 911? Mueller the mule

  2. They did this trick in NYC when pressure-cooker-bombs placed in dumpsters in/around NYC were cavalierly dismissed as 'prank' bombs and not terrur bombs.


Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments