Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Sunday, April 4, 2021

A Huge Win Against Vaccines: Gates and Fauci Will Be Broken

Safety is definitely a critical aspect as well as being fully informed of the ingredients and potential side affects of any vaccine. Having said that and even if these conditions are met and exceeded, does that mean that a mandatory ruling supersedes my constitutional rights? 

I don't think so and wish more emphasis was placed on our constitutional rights as being our primary right which obviously negates anything related to a vaccine being mandatory. 

This video blows the vaccine efficacy theory out of the water. Let's blow mandatory out of the water too and uphold the constitution for all our rights!

 https://www.icandecide.org/lawsuits/

22 comments:

  1. Thank you so very much. Awesome video!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The constitution does not give you any rights; it stops government from taking away any of the rights you were born with. After all, man created government, not the other way around.....

      Delete
  2. Amen for Del BigTree and Robert Kennedy jr. Thank you thank you thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. All for $$$ and power! Unbelievable!

    ReplyDelete
  4. name the lawsuit case that was won, please

    ReplyDelete
  5. name the lawsuit case that was won, please

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here are some links for follow up research, always a good idea!

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ican-vs-hhs-key-legal-win-recasts-vaccine-debate-300712629.html

    LOS ANGELES, Sept. 14, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has admitted that, in direct violation of Federal law, it failed to provide a single vaccine safety report to Congress for thirty years, according to Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN).



    This acknowledgement comes after eight months of stonewalling from HHS following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from the nonprofit ICAN, and its founder Del Bigtree. ICAN sought copies of the reports HHS was required to submit to Congress every two years, starting in 1988, detailing improvements it made to vaccine safety. ICAN was represented by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

    ICAN sued HHS in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, demanding that the reports be shared with the public. HHS eventually conceded that those reports do not exist and the Court entered an order confirming this concession.

    "The 1986 National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act granted economic immunity to pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries and hence eviscerated their economic incentive for them to take responsibility for vaccine safety," says Bigtree. "Market forces driving vaccine safety were simply eliminated."

    Congress therefore charged the Secretary of HHS with the explicit responsibility to assure vaccine safety. Biannual reports of HHS's progress in improving vaccine safety were to be submitted to Congress. Yet, as ICAN has now proven, these reports were never created.

    https://www.icandecide.org/ Del Bigtree's organization, with links to various lawsuits.

    http://stateofthenation.co/?p=14682

    ReplyDelete
  7. Is this a 2021 case or the old one from 2018/19? If he won the case in 2018, why are they allowed to continue with these vaccines?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.icandecide.org/lawsuits/

      Delete
    2. I would like to know this too

      Delete
    3. Check the link I provided, several cases

      Delete
    4. This is from last year & it hasn't changed anything for this years untested jab

      Delete
  8. So happy that they are finally being challenged. I am a retired nurse and always accepted the need for vaccines- never questioned any of this. My kids only received 3 not like today where they get 72. I really questioned vaccines when I decided that I needed a tetanus vaccine as it been over 10 years. The only vaccine you can get is the DPT shot which I did take and subsequently developed the worst case of shingles. When I happened on a patient group online, you would not believe the number of people who got shingles after a flu shot. It disrupts your immune system. Then I started reading books on vaccines and was horrified to find out how many shots that babies get today, what's in them and the rate of autism and how they lied about the studies. There was a whistleblower who confirmed these lies. My son has 2 babies and I tried to tell him about it but he wouldn't accept anything I said. Basically just told me that you can't be out there looking at videos on YouTube and would not accept there was a whistleblower. I know how to do investigations as I did that with my job. I also just found out that a group of scientists have evaluated immunity from tetanus shots and recommended to the CDC that a booster is only recommended every 30 years. Good luck with that as they will only think about the money and not patients.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I got a DPT for tetanus about 20 yrs now and I will never get another one . I didn't get shingles, but my arm doubled in size and was hot and very painful. I could not work for a couple if days. Husband had the same reaction.

      Delete
    2. I got a DPT for tetanus about 20 yrs now and I will never get another one . I didn't get shingles, but my arm doubled in size and was hot and very painful. I could not work for a couple if days. Husband had the same reaction.

      Delete
  9. Thank you! Can you do the same with the chemtrails? Please!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK I will try! They seem to be backing off a bit

      Delete
    2. I also think when it comes to such a life threatening or injurious issue of this magnitude, i think Congess needs to get consent from the American people of whom they serve at our discretion the right to VOTE IT INTO LAW OR REJECT IT.And furthermore the 28 Amendment, (you know,the We The Peoples Constitution,states,"whats good for the goose is good for the gander."

      Delete
  10. Thank you for all of your service to mankind.

    ReplyDelete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments