Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Friday, April 2, 2021

Inequity? and Equity -- The New Battle For Your Mind

Sarcasm? Insanity? Someone's Reality

seen on an article about Biden wrecking the country


But doesn't inequality rip your heart to pieces? To me, it's proof that the Republicans also have a heart. I can't believe you're ok with living in a world with racial inequality. The very fact that some groups of people are born into better circumstances than others eats me up daily. We need racial equality no matter what and on matter the cost.

If the races were so different as monkeys and chimpanzees are, we should still demand racial equality. If the races were as far apart as the Moon and Mars, we should still demand racial equality and build a space vessel to bring them together. If one race has five legs and another has three legs, we should chop two legs off of the five legged or grow two on the three legged until the races are equal. We will not rest until we have no distinction among the races. It should be our only priority.

If one speaks of innovation, we ask of them what innovations they bring to the table that bring the races into a state of equality. If one speaks of courage, we ask what bold things they have done and said that unites the races under the shade of the same tree. If one speaks of honesty, we ask them what words they have rhymed that expresses the heartache and grief resulting from racial inequality. If one speaks of beauty, we must ask them where could this beauty originate other than in the faces of the racially ambiguous.

We must march single minded, aligning all of our faculties of reason, passion, and spirit, towards racial equality.

    • Avatar

      Are you serious or just sarcastic. My European ancestors were much, much worse off than people living in poverty today. Their life and death struggles made it possible for us to live better today, and that goes for the whole world. Why is the population in Africa rising. Have better medicine and food production something to do with it. There was and is social inequality, but where was racial inequality when most people in the West were White. In fact, in Europe everyone was of a white European race until recently. Where was the racial inequality. Today, we have equal opportunity. A black or Asian child can attend school and achieve just like anyone else. Besides, it is liberals running the school boards. So one can blame liberals or the pupils for failures. Anyone has the right to vote and so on. Talk about racial inequality is just a bunch of hooey.

    • Avatar

      If you think about it though, whites have caused global 3rd world human overpopulation. Maybe whites need to be weakened so that this mess can be fixed. Because look at our situation right now:

      What race caused 3rd world overpopulation (medicine and food technology)?
      What race created plastics that now fill the ocean floor?
      What race transported blacks all over the globe?
      What race increased the black population by a factor of 20?
      What race created machines for mass transportation/immigration?

    What race opened our borders up for mass immigration, thus destroying whites?

    I think the solution is for whites to undergo another dark age. This resets it all back to zero. With peak oil, whites will never be able to create such global and self destruction again. Whites are the link holding it together, especially the global economic system. If our currency system fails, the whole thing falls. Acceleration of the decline will benefit us.

      • Avatar

        Good points. However, it is easy to reflect in hindsight. When all these advances were made, medicine, plastics, airplanes etc., no one could have imagined that in the future there will be adverse consequences. As far as overpopulation, it has something to do with personal responsibility. It seems that backward rural communities in third world nations have nothing else to do but pop out children. Our currency is bound to fail, and someone mentioned that it is better to be an average nation, hence a less desirable place to immigrate to, and be at peace.

          • Avatar

            For the most part the folks wading across the Rio Grande are coming from SUBSISTENCE lifestyles where infant death rates are high and surviving extra hands means more help on the farm or in the black market child labor trades. In other words, more kids makes economic (if cruel) sense in the 'home country'. Unfortunately, this 'subsistence' mentality doesn't simply disappear when you arrive in the U.S., especially since the U.S. welfare system subsidizes low income baby factories…both domestic and immigrant. The vote gathering power of the "WELFARE PLANTATION" is not a fantasy. It is a targeted Leftist agenda. In my opinion, dismantling the Federal Welfare System is critical to reestablishing responsible government. Leave charity to the local constituencies that will have to absorb the effects of irresponsible baby-making. Tough Love for bleeding hearts and the REAL RACISTS in this country.

          • -----------------------------------------------------------------

        Another comment, won't touch this with a 10 pole, on this article

        I confess I do not know the number of blacks in Africa who receive U.S. aid. I would suspect that they would get some from China or Europe, even if we were not there, simply because of the resources.

        I would be much more concerned with the fate of the white South Africans whose tightrope presence teeters on the brink of a promised genocide if black social controls destablize the country any further. That's a 50:5 million mix and it is a toxic one.

        Comparatively, there are ~45 million blacks in the United States. They do get a disproportionate amount of aid from us and you know the reason. Simple fear of predatory rapacity if they are not appeased. Burn Loot Murder, 2020, highlights the sheer ugliness of the threat they represent.

        Democrats in particular recognize this and refuse to institute a three strikes death penalty and aggressive policing to reverse the problem because to them, a black is a once per season vote they can always count upon in turn for tax payer money that doesn't really exist in a massive budgetary debt environment anyway.

        Republicans brought blacks to northern industrializing areas to undercut white skilled labor, decades after post Civil War laws effectively made it all but impossible for blacks to live there. So business greed drives their position. Along with a 'traditional' desire to capture a vote which the Democrats are now abandoning for a new victimizer population.

        For whites to defeat all three groups would require us to take on the U.S. military and to engage in genocidal dislocation which would make us look like the Nazis X1,000.

        You have no idea how hard it is to kill and dispose of 45 million people. The greatest argument against the lie of the Holocaust is that the Germans could not do it in 2-3 years to only 6 million with only individual crematory ovens to cover up the crime. Without nuclear or chemical weapons, it would literally be the work of a century or more for us.

        If you can't beat them and don't like what they represent as a unitatis future, then YOU must be the one to cut free and help deploy our own backup chute.

        Blacks know full well their own limitations. Look to the _black children_ in the schoolteacher article here on AmRen who, when asked what would happen if whites disappeared, said simply 'We be skrewed'. They also know that their constant criminal antics, low social potential as genetic IQ and the utter welfare dependency of their women in trying to sustain a stable total population with a third of their men behind bars makes them an economic nightmare to the extent that Latinos are now seen as a preferred lower labour class alternative.

        Blacks also cannot survive an American no-one-loves-them social environment where they are cut loose from every point of influence.

        Since we cannot deport them in numbers (no African country or group of countries could support so many and the local black tribes would rapidly slaughter them for trying fit back in), the notion that we might give them a percentage of land equivalent to their population presence, _just to be rid of them_ should be genuinely looked at as a possible alternative.

        Because, just like the screams for Stimulus money in the wake of the COVID lockdown spoof, it will be very hard for the few intelligent black political class to make the argument that they would not be better off on their own, in a prebuilt, advanced, societal environment than clinging to the racists who hate them. Especially if sold as the ultimate Reparation.

        I would nominate The South, simply because it's climate is more congenial to black biology and a fitting punishment for the whites who brought this biped pathogen to our shores. But I would not maroon them within a black enclave either. Rather, I would bring Southern Whites back into our lands so that we _might_ possibly begin to heal the wounds of the Northern Aggression.

        We can stop sending food to Africa whenever we desire. But we cannot ignore 45 million potential insurgents in our own living space until we find them a separate place to live.

        The South gives them two ports, the petroleum reserve, Georgia's agriculture and all of Florida's tourist industry to enrich themselves. And it rids us, both, of each other's total contempt for the other's digust and shunning in a shared social presence.

        We must fix what is ours, geographically and socially, to fix because it hurts us to ignore it. Africa is not our problem. Never Was.

        No comments:

        Post a Comment

        Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments