Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Sunday, May 30, 2021

COVID Has no Credible Natural Ancestor -- It Was Made With Gain Of Function "Research"

Submitted by a reader And spot on, keep your eyes peeled on what they don't want you to even be looking at: -------------------------------------------------------

At the start of the COVID caper, we blew by Levels 1 and 2 [virus real vs. not real; real virus natural vs. real virus man-made] before most of us had a chance to identify anybody "responsible", much less point fingers of blame. Veterans Today did run some articles fingering Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina, concluding that during military games in Wuhan foreigners released biological agents, presumably to frame China and to misdirect attention away from the US and its collaborators.

So it is interesting indeed to read the recent article authored by Josh Boswell and published by THE DAILY MAIL:

EXCLUSIVE: COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor' and WAS created by Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks with 'retro-engineering' to make it seem like it naturally arose from bats, explosive new study claims

An explosive new study claims researchers found 'unique fingerprints' in COVID-19 samples that they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a laboratory exclusively obtained the new 22-page paper authored by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen set to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery

The study showed there's evidence to suggest Chinese scientists created the virus while working on a Gain of Function project in a Wuhan lab

Gain of Function research, which was temporarily outlawed in the US, involves altering naturally-occurring viruses to make them more infectious in order to study their potential effects on humans

According to the paper, Chinese scientists took a natural coronavirus 'backbone' found in Chinese cave bats and spliced onto it a new 'spike', turning it into the deadly and highly transmissible COVID-19
The researchers, who concluded that COVID-19 'has no credible natural ancestor', also believe scientists reverse-engineered versions of the virus to cover up their tracks
'We think that there have been retro-engineered viruses created,' Dalgleish told 'They've changed the virus, then tried to make out it was in a sequence years ago.'
The study also points to 'deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data' in Chinese labs and notes that 'scientists who wished to share their findings haven't been able to do so or have disappeared'
Until recently, most experts had staunchly denied the origins of the virus were anything other than a natural infection leaping from animals to humans
Earlier this week, Dr. Anthony Fauci defended US funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, saying the $600,000 grant was not approved for Gain of Function research.

Given the tarnishing of reigning stars of COVID -- in particular, Bill Gates of Hell and Tony Fauci -- one might fairly surmise both would depart from the stage of COVID and not appear in the next act, on which the curtain will rise soon. Moreover, to those of us still ingesting Hopium on weekends, a seeming unraveling of the later stages of COVID-related oppression had begun to occur in many countries. The story above, however, signals a RE-GROUPING, a return to earlier, lower levels of the COVID scamdemic.

Once again questions about the origin -- but note carefully, not the REALITY -- of "the virus" get big play in mainstream media, never a good sign of reliability, much less truth. I suspect Jon Rappoport will look closely at how credible the scientists are and how valid their methodology. In the meantime, with China's lab back on the hook, Dr. Faucistein looks to wriggle OFF the hook. He may have funded something, but not "gain of function" studies! Oh, no, never.

We be played, again and again and again.


  1. The OffGuardian positions itself as “alternative media” – NOT the Daily Mail or the Guardian, understand? – thus seems a likely stand-in as controlled opposition in the UK. Not unlike Mike King’s Anti-New York Times site, though with much less edginess. Consider the following as an exhibit offered in support of that vile accusation.

    Kit Knightly of the OffGuardian wrote an article entitled “If COVID Is a Bioweapon, It’s a Rubbish One” in which “our latest fact-check examines the Covid bioweapon theory. The origins of it, the evidence for it, and the possible motivations behind its sudden resurgence.” As mentioned in the post that occasions this comment, the author proceeds to summarize briefly Levels One and Two of the COVID saga: “Sometime in the winter of 2019/2020, when the coronavirus 'pandemic' was still only incipient, a theory started doing the rounds that the alleged 'novel coronavirus' had in fact been grown in a laboratory, and either released by accident or deployed deliberately as a bioweapon…. Who was responsible, and why, was never really nailed down. Some articles said it had escaped by accident from a Chinese lab. Others said it was loosed deliberately by the US to weaken China.”

    The article lists several of the recent “flip-flops”, first the dismissal of “theories” of the origin of “Sars-Cov-2 virus”, then their acceptance or reconsideration, most notably those of Joe Biden’s administration, the WHO [not that The Who], and Dr. Faucistein himself! The author then mentions the lack of evidence for the actual, solid, irrefutable evidence for the existence of said “virus”, whether natural or man-made. In passing, the author asks “Why the sudden change?” The answer proffered: “…The lab-leak theory does serve the Deep State agenda in one fashion: it reinforces the idea that the virus is a real problem that needs to be solved, rather than a fear-based control narrative. Fear is fear, and whether it’s of a zoonotic virus or a bioweapon, it can be used to bend a population to your will.”

    In concluding, the author accepts the reality of Sars-Cov-2 virus: “Maybe the virus was grown in a lab, maybe it just jumped from bats to people. Since all evidence suggests it’s not very dangerous, it doesn’t really matter. The debate sure does make a good distraction though.”

    Yessirree, that debate surely returns us forward to the past, doesn’t it, promoting absolutely no progress toward resolving the scamdemic and reversing oppressive measures associated with CON-trolling the putative pandemic. All that “flip-flopping” just indicates that political leaders and their public health enforcers are incompetent, not ill-willed. Right, mate.

    1. I totally agree that the current discussion of China lab or not, is intended for distraction of the real issues. The cabal takeover of USA via blatant in your face vote fraud, and the analysis of just how much abuse will humans take with "proper messaging" seems that even the maternal instinct can be over rode in getting pregnant females to take the jab even though 60% experience significant problems from the jab, and in 16% the baby is dead within 2 weeks.

  2. Trust Jon Rappoport to bring us back to earth, at the very foundation of the COVID scamdemic. As the beginning, so now: I find myself on the same page as Mr. Rappoport, a voice truly crying out in the wilderness of fakery and lies.

    Please take a moment and read JR's latest post, which ties up all the loose and waving ends (most electrified, do not touch!). [stock, please consider running on the "front page"!]

    ALSO: An intrepid blogger with EXTRAORDINARY patience from Manitoba, Canada:

    Wuhan Lab, bioweapon, gain of function, but…the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist in the first place
    May 31, 2021, by Jon Rappoport


    by Jon Rappoport


    What I’m about to lay out might seem “too staggering to believe.”

    Fortunately, what people do or don’t believe isn’t the issue.

    And with that, here we go. Buckle up.

    For the past year, I’ve been presenting evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. It’s never been proven to exist. [1]

    Those who claim it does exist have two legs to try to stand on. One: the virus has been isolated (discovered). [2] And two: its genetic sequence has been found. [3] [3a]

    However, the mainstream scientific definition of “isolated” turns out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in a lab. The soup contains all sorts of material. We never extracted the virus from the soup.” In other words, “isolated” means its opposite.

    In the soup, in addition to the purported virus, there are human and monkey cells, toxic drugs, chemicals, and other genetic material. When the cells begin to die, researchers assert (with no proof) that the cause of cell-death must be the virus.

    Therefore, the virus IS in the soup, and it is deadly.

    However, the drugs and chemicals could be killing the cells, and the cells are being starved of nutrients, so that could certainly account for their death.

    Bottom line: There is no proof of isolation. It isn’t even close. There is no evidence that the purported virus is in the soup.



Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments