Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.
1. “Those that talk about “individual liberties” 2. “Those that advocate for states’ rights 3. “Those that want “to make the world a better place” 4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule” 5.“Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists” 6.“Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations” 7. “Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable” 8. “Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions” 9. “Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay” 11. “Anti-Immigrant” 12. “Anti-Muslim” 13. “The Patriot Movement” 14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians” 15. Members of the Family Research Council 16. Members of the American Family Association 17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union” 18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol 19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform 20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition 21. Members of the Christian Action Network 22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order” 23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing” 24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21 25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps 26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations” 27. The militia movement 28. The sovereign citizen movement 29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes” 30. Anyone that “complains about bias” 31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia” 32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies” 33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs” 34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views” 35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes” 36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance” 37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance” 38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons” 39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology” 40. “Militia or unorganized militia” 41. “General right-wing extremist” 42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N. 43. Those that refer to an “Army of God” 44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)” 45. Those that are “anti-global” 46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority” 47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty” 48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories” 49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack” 50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism” 51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)” 52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere” 53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion” 54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy” 55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion” 56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic” 57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear” 58. “Rightwing extremists” 59. “Returning veterans” 60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration” 61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms” 62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling” 63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes” 64. “Anti-abortion activists” 65. Those that are against illegal immigration 66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner 67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations 68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes” 69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr 70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”) 71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies 72. Evangelical Christians
stock, you could spend hours a day, their work is so slanted, and with obvious goals that are against the benefit of the average public. Remember when they came out in the injection campaign and said “you are not a horse, you are not a cow” i.e. don’t take that horsepaste to save your life. And when they said, aspirin was no longer consider a safe of effective anti-clotting mechanism, and you should not proceed with self treatment without the specific advice of your doctor.
State Approaches to Stopping Violence Against Health Care Workers
Then look at this arsehole commentor, swing what is probably mostly verbal “assaults” into “gun violence”. Shameful. New York.
———————————
Nina Agrawal, MD | City University of NY – School of Public Health
—————————
Thank you for raising awareness about gun violence in healthcare. While there is extensive discussion about criminal penalties for healthcare violence, there is no evidence that this is a deterrent. A public health approach to gun violence is lacking. We need to better define the problem and address the root cause. We need to require healthcare administrators to report data on all security threats, including weapon and the circumstances. Most mass shootings are intimate partner violence related, and this has been a frequent factor in healthcare violence. Please see my article on healthcare rage and shootings in
———————————- Now they are committed to publishing their propaganda faster, therefore with more deniability of negligence and just “we had to do it fast” therefore sometimes we might be wrong or not complete.
Dylan Matthews is a senior correspondent and head writer for Vox’s Future Perfect section and has worked at Vox since 2014. He is particularly interested in global health and pandemic prevention, anti-poverty efforts, economic policy and theory, and conflicts about the right way to do philanthropy.
—————————————————-
stock here: this is “hilarious” Its released into the 2nd half of 2024, but they are using “projections” of infant death in 2022 and 2023, ignoring data and papering it over with “projections”
————————————————–
This story is part of a group of stories called
Finding the best ways to do good.
The world has become a much safer place to be a young child in the last 50 years. Since 1974, infant mortality worldwide has plummeted. That year, one in 10 newborns died before reaching their first birthday. By 2021, that rate had fallen by over two-thirds.
A lot of factors drove this change: lower poverty and better nutrition, cleaner air and water, and readily available antibiotics and other treatments. But one of the biggest contributors, a new study from the World Health Organization (WHO) concludes, was vaccines.
Vaccines alone, the researchers find, accounted for 40 percent of the decline in infant mortality. The paper — authored by a team of researchers led by WHO epidemiologist and vaccine expert Naor Bar-Zeev — estimates that in the 50 years since 1974, vaccines prevented 154 million deaths.
stock here: he was “too genuine” out of the gate. The touting of his religiousness was bullshit designed to “win over” some non-secular Trumpers. He fuels inflation, fund death and destruction, and enhances spying and propaganda.
Surprised they don’t have him slaughter a baby or two in front of Baphomet. Just to mock us even more. Do they have something on him, or is he willingly playing his part as a puppet?
Reminder, ZH is controlled opposition, but that doesn’t make them completely useless.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Elsewhere, Harari elaborates on the reasons for his fellow elitists’ cold-hearted indifference to the fate of the vast majority of Earth’s inhabitants:
“If you go back to the middle of the 20th century … and you think about building the future, then your building materials are those millions of people who are working hard in the factories, in the farms, the soldiers. You need them. You don’t have any kind of future without them.”
What he means is that you – referring to the dominant social and financial elites of that era – still “needed” the labour of millions in the various fields of economic endeavour in order to turn a profit. Since then, how have things changed according to “futurologist” Harari?
“Now, fast forward to the early 21st century when we just don’t need the vast majority of the population, because the future is about developing more and more sophisticated technology, like artificial intelligence [and] bioengineering, most people don’t contribute anything to that, except perhaps for their data, and whatever people are still doing something useful, these technologies increasingly will make them redundant and will make it possible to replace those people.”
Elitist mouthpiece Harari deserves credit for blood-curdling honesty, if not for the morality of his and his masters’ “visions.” He is plainly signalling the view that this writer, the editors of this portal, its readers and the rest of mankind are expendable and apart from whatever economic utility they still might possess are bereft of any inherent dignity or value.
Harari and his immediate superior in the elitist nomenklatura, Klaus Schwab, technically are private individuals. Their organisational vehicle, the World Economic Forum, is a private NGO registered in Switzerland. Formally, they neither represent nor do they speak for any government or official structure with a proper claim to legitimacy. They have no licence to plan or arrange the future of humanity, beside the self-authorisation to do so which they and the oligarchical globalist power centres they commune and mingle with have arrogated to themselves. No one elected or empowered them to plan anybody’s future, other than their own, and even that strictly in their private capacity.
Yet disposing of the future of mankind is precisely what they presume to do, in Davos in plenary session once a year and the rest of the time in conspiratorial confabulation amongst themselves.
The nature of the “planning” in which they engage should be of deep interest and grave concern to everyone. Not just for the unbridled hubris it displays but more pointedly for the homicidal design that underlies it, on a vast and hitherto unimaginable scale which Raphael Lemkin was incapable of conceiving when he coined the term “genocide.”
It is indisputable that Harari speaks not just in his own or Schwab’s name. He is publicly articulating the ideological vision of a depopulated Earth, cleansed of human presence and tinged with occultist misanthropy. That vision is widely shared by the luminaries of his elitist set. A high profile member of that set, Bill Gates, has been insistently stressing the need to dispose of the useless multitudes by any means, fair or foul. One of Gates’ alarmingly explicit elocutions on this subject was removed by YouTube, allegedly for “violating community guidelines.” The real reason for expunging his remarks from the internet was the danger that they could raise an alarm amongst the targeted “flood victims,” provoking them to react with uncontrollable rage once they discovered what the elitist “visionaries” have in store for them.
These psychopathic serial killers (we should not mince words) using their vast financial, political and media (brainwashing) resources are inexorably putting into effect a homicidal global depopulation agenda. Depopulation, as Harari has honestly admitted, means physically eliminating as many human beings as they deem superfluous or useless for their purposes. The concept of population control, again not to mince words, is their code for global genocide.
The Club of Rome, one of the institutional components of the depopulation network, in a programmatic document published in 1974 could not have put the main principle of their genocidal philosophy more starkly: “The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.” Is it necessary to clarify that cancers are not nurtured and cultivated? Cancers are to be extirpated.
F. William Engdahl recently shined extraordinary light on the deep roots of the nefarious plan, discussed and implemented openly by its malevolent promoters in plain view of the intended victims. Engdahl has shown that perverts like Schwab and Harari are but public faces of a malevolent trans-generational scheme.
Engdahl quotes from a report issued by the Club of Rome, “The First Global Revolution.” It is admitted there that the CO2 global warming claims, serving as the convenient rationale to forcefully impose upon humanity an endless array of destructive structural changes, are merely an invented ruse.
That is because “…the common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
“The agenda,” Engdahl sombrely concludes, “is dark, dystopian and meant to eliminate billions of us ‘ordinary humans.’”
An important clarification needs to be made. Humanity is not the enemy, but is on the contrary the crown of God’s creation. And it is humanity itself that now is facing an implacable enemy, in this case a collective incarnation of the defining characteristic Edward Gibbon attributed to the depraved emperors Commodus and Caracalla: “common enemy of mankind.”
This time round, however, humanity is no longer facing the perverse eccentricities of an individual deviant. Today, it must confront Commodus’ and Caracalla’s collective personification, in the form of a depraved global oligarchy, imbued with dangerous delusions of omnipotence and impunity.
Why have we chosen to dwell on this dark subject? In the first place, because the intended genocide victims world-wide are entitled to be informed and naturally they also have the right to self-defence, in order to preserve their own and their families’ lives, as well as to ensure the integrity of their societies, cultures, historical memory, and way of life.
But there is also another important reason, to expose the cynicism and utter amorality of the genocidal fanatics who still are directing the destiny of a considerable portion of mankind and exert their energies continuously to regain complete control over the remainder.
Acting through their proxies Germany and Rwanda, recently joined by France and a few other puppet governments, they had the impudence to submit in the General Assembly of the United Nations a resolution to condemn and memorialise the fabricated “genocide” in Srebrenica, censuring for genocide a nation that throughout the twentieth century has itself been the target for effective extinction.
That is the very crime that they themselves are brazenly plotting to commit, not in some remote Balkan municipality but upon humanity as a whole.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Stephen Karganovic is president of “Srebrenica Historical Project,” an NGO registered in the Netherlands to investigate the factual matrix and background of events that took place in Srebrenica in July of 1995. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
Featured image: Ted Talk video screenshot
Rethinking Srebrenica
By Stephen Karganovic
Rethinking Srebrenica examines the forensic evidence of the alleged Srebrenica “massacre” possessed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague. Even though the ICTY created more than 3,500 autopsy reports, many of these autopsy reports were based on bone fragments, which do not represent complete bodies. An examination of the matching femur bones found reveals that there were only about 1,900 complete bodies that were exhumed. Of these, some 1,500 autopsy reports indicated a cause of death consistent with battlefield casualties. Only about 400 autopsy reports indicated execution as a cause of death, as revealed by ligatures and blindfolds. This forensic evidence does not warrant the conclusion of a genocide having taken place.
Karganovic examines the events that took place in Srebrenica in July 1995 in a wholistic manner instead of restricting it to a three-day event. The ten chapters cover:
1) Srebrenica: A Critical Overview;
2) Demilitarization of the UN Safe Zone of Srebrenica;
3) Genocide or Blowback?;
4) General Presentation and Interpretation of Srebrenica Forensic Data (Pattern of Injury Breakdown);
5) An Analysis of the Srebrenica Forensic Reports Prepared by the ICTY Prosecution Experts;
6) An Analysis of Muslim Column Losses Attributable to Minefields, Combat Activity, and Other Causes;
7) The Genocide Issue: Was there a Demonstrable Intent to Exterminate All Muslims?;
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
stock here: most definitely, Hawaii is in a hard recession. Although prices are not deflating. Businesses are charging what they need to charge, at least what they think, and people in general are scared. Most see just more inflation in the future and therefore the competitive process to reduce prices, as has happened on the mainland, is not happening in Hawaii, at least not now. This is further crushing the islands.
Because we have not yet had an official recession the US Media, CNBC keeps discussing a soft landing, however I’ve always been the camp that a recession is coming, was simply delayed.
The yield curve has been inverted for over 500 days, we’ve only seen this 3 times in history:
1. 2007/2008 2. 1973/1974 3. 1927/1929
All 3 saw > 50% stock market drawdowns
Hopefully things don’t have to go through one of those major corrections/hard times like back then, but it would not surprise me, we all know something bad is eventually coming.
please give an expansive description of the yield curve inversion and the psychological processes that accompany it
ChatGPT
A yield curve inversion is a significant event in the financial markets that occurs when short-term interest rates are higher than long-term interest rates. In other words, it’s when the yield curve, which typically slopes upwards from shorter-term to longer-term maturities, flips and slopes downwards. This inversion of the yield curve is often interpreted as a warning sign of an impending economic recession.
Here’s an expansive description of the yield curve inversion and the psychological processes that accompany it:
Yield Curve Basics:
The yield curve is a graphical representation of the relationship between the yields (interest rates) and the time to maturity of bonds of the same credit quality but different maturities. Normally, longer-term bonds have higher yields to compensate investors for the added risk of holding the bond for a longer period.
Inversion Dynamics:
Yield curve inversions typically occur when investors become pessimistic about the economy’s future prospects. When economic uncertainty rises, demand for long-term bonds increases, pushing their prices higher and their yields lower. Conversely, short-term rates may remain steady or rise due to central bank actions or expectations of near-term economic tightening.
This inversion can occur due to various factors, including expectations of future interest rate cuts by central banks, concerns about economic growth slowing down, or fears of an impending recession.
Psychological Processes:
Risk Aversion: Investors become increasingly risk-averse when they anticipate economic troubles ahead. They seek the safety of long-term bonds, driving their prices up and yields down.
Expectations of Economic Downturn: A yield curve inversion reflects widespread beliefs among investors that economic growth will slow down or even contract in the future. This pessimism can become self-reinforcing as investors adjust their behavior based on these expectations, potentially leading to a downturn.
Anxiety and Uncertainty: Yield curve inversions often trigger anxiety and uncertainty among investors, policymakers, and the general public. There’s a fear of the unknown, as an inverted yield curve has historically been a reliable predictor of recessions.
Loss Aversion: Investors may also fear potential losses in the stock market or other riskier assets if a recession materializes. This fear can drive them to sell stocks and move into safer investments, exacerbating market volatility.
Confirmation Bias: Once a yield curve inversion occurs, investors and analysts may search for further evidence to confirm their beliefs about an impending recession. This can lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of negative sentiment and market behavior.
Market Impact:
Yield curve inversions can have significant impacts on financial markets. They often lead to stock market sell-offs, as investors reevaluate their risk exposure and adjust their portfolios accordingly. Additionally, they can influence central bank policies, with central banks potentially cutting interest rates to stimulate economic growth and counteract the recessionary pressures signaled by the inversion.
In summary, a yield curve inversion represents more than just an esoteric financial phenomenon; it’s a reflection of broader economic sentiment and can have profound psychological effects on market participants. It serves as a warning sign of potential economic trouble ahead, triggering anxiety, uncertainty, and shifts in investor behavior that can further influence market dynamics.
stock here: I don’t want to focus too much on the “Longhouse” metaphor, as much as looking at this explanation as one of the explanation for the funk that we find ourselves in. Please ponder and chime in. I have decided that the “longhouse” metaphor is for communal living, as in….we are all in this together so must must pull together to celebrate and care for the Personality Defects. Seems like the outcome should not surprise anyone, but to a leftist, that doesn’t matter, they can always say “our hearts were in the right place”.
Now, she has headed on over to NPR where she can use your tax money to fuck up the USA, and belittle you non-understanding racist white supremacists.
what is this? Cluster B Longhouse psychopathology.ChatGPT
“Cluster B” refers to one of the four clusters of personality disorders as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). These disorders are characterized by dramatic, erratic, or emotional behavior. The disorders included in Cluster B are:
Antisocial Personality Disorder: Characterized by a disregard for the rights of others, lack of empathy, and a pattern of criminal or impulsive behavior.
Borderline Personality Disorder: Marked by unstable relationships, self-image, and emotions, as well as impulsive behavior.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Characterized by a grandiose sense of self-importance, a need for admiration, and a lack of empathy for others.
The term “Longhouse psychopathology” doesn’t seem to be a standard term in psychology or psychiatry. It’s possible it could be referring to a specific theory, concept, or study related to personality disorders within the context of a longhouse, which historically was a type of communal dwelling used by various indigenous peoples. Without further context, it’s difficult to provide a precise interpretation.
This may somewhat clarify the Longhouse, but I still don’t see the nature of the phrase As psychologists have long known, there is a long-established link between violent personalities and left-wing authoritarianism. The mugshots of Antifa footsoldiers drive home the point. These are not mentally well people. They are the hideous face of anti-social violence, the enforcement arm of the modern left, and the political vanguard of our Cluster B society. And they will not stop until they have transformed the world in their own image. Enter The Longhouse Anonymous right-wing critics have taken to calling this strange new Cluster B regime “The Longhouse,” a matriarchal form of society that privileges the values of care, concern, and feminine social strategies. In an essay for the magazine First Things, the pseudonymous writer L0m3z explains that women now outnumber men in professional managerial roles and vastly outnumber men in Human Resource departments, which have outsized influence over professional and cultural norms. The left too is now acknowledging the emergence of the Longhouse. In her presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton confidently declared that “The Future Is Female.” And in an essay for The Atlantic, Hanna Rosen heralded this change with an essay titled, “The End Of Men.” Both were correct. But while some are celebrating the shift, our female future is not an unalloyed good. Despite what we’re told, biological sex differences are real. An imbalance between the two has negative effects for everyone. Taken too far, overly feminized leadership produces exactly the kind of Cluster B society we’re living in today, one in which identity is rewarded over merit, in which victimhood is prioritized over competence, in which anti-social behavior goes unchecked, in which moral narcissism is the currency of the realm. The Cluster B society is upon us and we must find a way out. We must find a way to restore balance, to restore order, to restore sanity, because if we don’t, we are resigned to a world gone mad. ChatGPT
The phrase “Cluster B Longhouse psychopathology” seems to be used in this context to describe a societal phenomenon characterized by the dominance of traits associated with Cluster B personality disorders (antisocial, borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic) within a framework metaphorically referred to as “The Longhouse.”
In this passage, “The Longhouse” is depicted as a matriarchal societal structure that allegedly privileges values traditionally associated with feminine social strategies, such as care and concern. The author suggests that this societal shift has led to an imbalance in leadership roles, with women outnumbering men in influential positions, particularly in areas like Human Resources.
The term “Cluster B” is then used to describe the societal consequences of this shift, implying that the leadership and cultural norms that have emerged are characterized by traits associated with Cluster B personality disorders. These traits are described as promoting identity over merit, victimhood over competence, and moral narcissism as the prevailing value system.
The overall argument appears to be critical of what the author perceives as the negative consequences of a shift towards a matriarchal societal structure, linking it to the emergence of what they term a “Cluster B society” marked by dysfunction and moral decay.
what is the metaphor of the longhouse? What was literally a longhouse in the past?ChatGPT
In literal terms, a longhouse was a traditional type of dwelling historically used by various indigenous peoples around the world, particularly in regions such as North America, Southeast Asia, and Oceania. These structures were typically elongated buildings constructed with a frame of poles and covered with materials like bark, thatch, or mats. Longhouses served as communal living spaces where extended families or entire communities resided together, often containing multiple hearths and compartments for different families.
Metaphorically, in the passage you provided, “The Longhouse” seems to represent a societal structure or system characterized by matriarchal influence and the prioritization of values associated with femininity. The metaphor suggests a shift towards a society where feminine social strategies, such as care and concern, are emphasized, potentially leading to a societal imbalance or dysfunction, as described in the passage’s critique.
Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries are considered a gold standard in battery technology for several reasons:
Safety: LiFePO4 batteries are inherently safer than other lithium-ion batteries, especially when it comes to thermal stability and resistance to thermal runaway events. This is due to the robust chemical structure of lithium iron phosphate, which is less prone to overheating and combustion compared to other lithium-ion chemistries.
Longevity: LiFePO4 batteries have a longer cycle life compared to other lithium-ion batteries. They can withstand a higher number of charge-discharge cycles without significant degradation, making them ideal for applications where longevity is critical, such as electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy storage systems.
Temperature Performance: LiFePO4 batteries perform well across a wide range of temperatures, both in terms of charging efficiency and discharge performance. This makes them suitable for use in extreme environmental conditions without sacrificing performance or reliability.
Environmental Friendliness: Lithium iron phosphate is composed of abundant and environmentally friendly materials, including lithium, iron, and phosphate. Unlike some other lithium-ion chemistries that contain cobalt, which has environmental and ethical concerns associated with its mining, LiFePO4 batteries have a lower environmental impact.
As for why Tesla hasn’t widely adopted LiFePO4 batteries in its electric vehicles, there are several factors to consider:
Energy Density: One of the key drawbacks of LiFePO4 batteries compared to other lithium-ion chemistries is their lower energy density. This means that for the same volume or weight, LiFePO4 batteries store less energy, resulting in reduced driving range for electric vehicles.
Performance: While LiFePO4 batteries offer advantages in safety and longevity, they may not provide the same level of performance in terms of power output and acceleration compared to other lithium-ion chemistries like lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) or lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA). Tesla’s vehicles are known for their high performance, and the company may prioritize chemistry that optimizes power output.
Supply Chain and Cost: Tesla has established supply chains and manufacturing processes optimized for other lithium-ion chemistries, such as NCA and NMC. Shifting to LiFePO4 batteries would require significant changes to its production lines and supply chain, which could involve substantial costs and logistical challenges.
Market Demand: While LiFePO4 batteries are well-suited for certain applications like stationary energy storage, the market demand for EVs with LiFePO4 batteries may be limited due to their lower energy density and potentially higher upfront costs.
Overall, while LiFePO4 batteries offer compelling advantages in safety and longevity, their lower energy density and potential performance trade-offs may limit their widespread adoption in electric vehicles like those produced by Tesla. However, they remain a popular choice for stationary energy storage applications where safety and longevity are paramount.
Here are the names of those missing on Maui. Officials want you to read every one.
In an aerial view, burned cars and homes are seen in a neighborhood that was destroyed by a wildfire on August 18, 2023 in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
CNN —
Withnearly 400 peoplestill unaccounted for aftercatastrophic wildfiresravaged most of Maui earlier this month, Hawaii officials released alist of names, hoping the public can help identify any of the missing individuals.
“We’re releasing this list of names today because we know that it will help with the investigation,” Maui County Police Chief John Pelletier said in the news release. “We also know that once those names come out, it can and will cause pain for folks whose loved ones are listed.”
“This is not an easy thing to do, but we want to make sure that we are doing everything we can to make this investigation as complete and thorough as possible.”
With the help of cell phone data being used to track down where victims may have been when the wildfires began andsearch crews and cadaver dogssearching single-story, multistory homes and commercial properties in the disaster area, officials believe this list will help lower the number of unaccounted for. As of late Thursday afternoon, an additional 1,732 individuals who had originally been reported as missing were found safe and well, they said in the release.
If you recognize a name on the list and know that person is safe or have information about them that could lead to locating them, the FBI is urging you to get in touch at (808) 566-4300 or HN-COMMAND-POST@ic.fbi.gov as soon as possible.
stock here: I do have a few panels stored inside a faraday cage (actually a cloth), and some MPP, and charge controllers….small stuff. But something is way better than nothing.
Quick statement from AI, I agree with it.
CAN YOU research on this EMP issue, how an emp would affect pv solar panels, and 2 cases, still connected to the grid or disconnected via a spade switch. Assume in all cases the the panels and rails are grounded at least to a ground rod and maybe to the entire facility electrical service. I am thinking only of residences ChatGPT
In the event of an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), whether caused by a natural occurrence like a solar flare or a human-made device, the impact on photovoltaic (PV) solar panels would depend on various factors, including the strength of the EMP, the design of the solar panels, and their connection to the electrical grid.
Connected to the Grid: In this scenario, the PV solar panels are connected to the electrical grid. The grid acts as a large conductive network, and any EMP-induced currents could potentially travel through the grid infrastructure and affect connected devices, including solar panels.
Effect on PV Solar Panels: The impact on PV solar panels connected to the grid during an EMP event would likely depend on the intensity of the pulse. If the EMP is strong enough, it could induce currents in the grid infrastructure, leading to potential damage to the inverters or other sensitive electronic components within the solar panel system. However, the extent of the damage would also depend on the design and resilience of the specific solar panel system.
Disconnected via a Spade Switch: In this scenario, the PV solar panels are disconnected from the electrical grid using a spade switch or similar disconnect mechanism. This disconnects the panels from the grid, isolating them from the grid’s infrastructure.
Effect on PV Solar Panels: Disconnecting the PV solar panels from the grid via a spade switch could potentially provide some level of protection against EMP-induced currents traveling through the grid infrastructure. However, the panels themselves could still be vulnerable to direct exposure to the EMP.
Grounding: Grounding the panels and rails to a ground rod and the facility’s electrical service can provide some level of protection against electrical surges, including those induced by an EMP. Proper grounding helps to dissipate excess electrical energy safely into the ground, reducing the risk of damage to the solar panel system.
It’s worth noting that the exact behavior of PV solar panels during an EMP event is not fully understood, and there is ongoing research in this area. Additionally, the effectiveness of protective measures such as grounding can vary depending on factors such as the strength and proximity of the EMP, the design of the solar panel system, and the quality of installation.
stock here: I bounced into this site searching for old April 2020 COVID info. They got a lot right, but wrong on Nuclear Plants are safe in an EMP, they think that because Nuke Plants make their own power, they are the safest place to be around. No.
stock — I often copy an entire post. To keep from happening what happened here. The guy got kicked off Facebook, or at least was forced to remove his article. I searched and he is not to be found on Facebook, either never learned about a “burner phone” or was just sick of Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=fred%20ethan%20weiss%20
Maybe I will email to him.
——————————————
“me” here, A great way to share is with links to “the juice” the real information, or at least the real source.
and here is apparently, his, Facebook post. Kind of odd just 3 posts, just saying. If I never did Facebook, I wouldn’t put something important out on Facebook.
As I am working remotely from the university, I fell I need to respond to the emails.
I am not an expert by any means, but I do work with experts in the College of Natural
Sciences and Mathematics at the California State University, Long Beach.
It is imperative at a time like this to be respectful and appreciative of our medical
personnel and research personnel to say the least. All the medical and research
people around the world, honestly ! The medical personnel are going to work and
are at risk of dying and or bringing this virus (with no cure) home to a family member.
Most of us go to work – but we are not at risk of dying !!!
So many people are dying, children are dying !!! We are losing doctors, nurses,
fireman, policeman and children ! This is like WAR !!! This has never been witnessed
in our lifetime. This is SO SERIOUS for humanity !!! This is NOT a “numbers thing”.
This novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) is not SARS2. This is a Novel Virus-
of course, novel meaning “new”. It is having surprising new and strange results every day.
The original predictions of only being dangerous for older people and people with
chronic diseases is not holding true.
Not sure if you are serious when you state that you are one of the top virologists or not.
I am not familiar with formal education, career background or work experience.
When I think of the top virologists, I think of Drs. Fauci, Birx, Redfield and the dedicated
folks that I work with on a daily basis. This is not something new they just decided to do
and talk about in the last couple months – this is a life commitment.
The Chemists, Microbiologists, Virologists, etc. at the University are all Ph.Ds and all have
years of experience doing research. Many of the faculty at CSULB, have $1M grants
from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Headquarters in Bethesda, Maryland.
The faculty works on viruses, cancer, autism, etc. We have the BUILD Program on
our campus – $25M funding. The Faculty and students are dedicated, loyal and humble
beings. They are dedicated to the human race.
There are Chemists, Biologists, Microbiologists, Virologists, etc. all over the world !!!!
Virologists do read charts and analyze the data. They created the data from their
tireless research. They contribute to the discovery of new vaccinations – this is a slow
and steady and accurate process.
In closing, I just want to say that I am thankful that we are ALL healthy and pray that
it stays this way. Please be kind and respectful to each other !!
THANK YOU to those on the frontline and on the back line. We appreciate you ALL!!!
————————————————————-
Notice, this other relative didn’t say that her friend wrote the below, just that “she sent it to me”. Selective ignoring relevant facts. Summary at bottom “Lock Down at ALL Costs!”
—————————————————
A friend of mine sent this to me this morning and it includes a lot of points I agree with. Three of my direct family members are working in potentially dangerous settings. It’s a long article but very worthwhile.
I’ve seen a lot of people itching to “reopen” the country. Maybe I can add a tiny bit to this conversation and hopefully not be castrated for it. I’m a physician (ER Radiologist) and I’m seeing these patients. Right now there are many, many unknowns.
1) A high percent of people who get sick are dying, including young and healthy patients. For some reason the statistics being reported in the news is not what I’m seeing. I’m seeing a high proportion of dying patients in their 40’s. I’ve seen probably 2x more 40 year olds dying than patients over 70.
UPDATE 4/21/20: Since there have been nursing home outbreaks, the morbidity and mortality age statistics I’ve observed have started to reflect what is being reported in the media. Understand, though, this disease still greatly impacts younger individuals in very high numbers.
2) The ones who are surviving, including those who have “asymptomatic” random findings I see in the ER’s end up having elevated cardiac markers. In other words, this virus is messing with young patients’ hearts… and not a little bit. I’m talking WILDLY elevated cardiac markers. This could result in a massive need for heart transplants in the next decade and only time will tell if these patients convert to full blown cardiomyopathies (not a diagnosis I would wish on my worst enemy). If you are not scared of “a little” pneumonia and a small percent chance of dying from it, you should ABSOLUTELY be scared of getting a cardiomyopathy (and being among many at one time who will be getting it). This would be devastating for society.
3) This is only the first wave of the infection. All pandemics we know of come back with a vengeance. We won’t know when and we won’t know how bad. The (now decreased) estimated loss of life only takes into account ONE wave WITH mitigation. Any other assumptions after this one wave is truly a blind guess.
4) We don’t know whether or not infected individuals are gaining immunity. We also don’t know when a vaccine will be declared effective. It will be at a MINIMUM (best case) 18 months before we know, not a worst case.
5) We don’t know the effect of viral load yet. Whether the amount of virus you’ve been exposed to or remains in your body is a factor. Does it take repeated exposures or just one to become ill?
6) We don’t know ALL the effects of this virus yet. We know a common symptom is loss of smell and taste. Besides being incredibly “inconvenient” it means this virus is infecting the neurologic system. Herpes/Varicella viruses infect the neurologic system and then can get reactivated as the immune system weakens or when you get older. (How would you like to go through a life threatening illness every year of your life when you get older?) We also know many viruses cause cancer… HIV, EBV, HPV, etc. We don’t know if that will be the case with this one yet.
7) We don’t even know how to treat this well yet… forget cure, I’m talking about “well.” Once infected and progressing to the need for a ventilator, this infection doesn’t behave at all like what we’ve seen before. Hence, ineffective treatment and ~80% mortality on a ventilator. You don’t want to be in that situation. The last thing you’ll experience is suffocation and intubation and no family or friends around you. Not a great way to go.
— My take: Now, I don’t know about you, but if it meant that I stay locked up in jail (and we are not) in order to save my wife’s life or my children’s lives, you damn well believe I’d do it. I’ve seen the biostatistics, the epidemiology, the lack of trustworthy data coming from other countries, the conspiracy theories, but most importantly I’ve seen these patients lives and families be destroyed. Play the long game and don’t be impulsive. If we have no people left to participate in an economy, in a government then none of this is worthwhile. The best thing you can do for yourself and this world right now is avoid this infection at all cost and stay alive. Yes, all cost.
stock here: some select emails I came across when moving email to a new computer. I was sending this to a wide group of family members. See the below, but on the next article I will post some of their responses….it appears that none of them followed the logic or charts. I was spending hundreds of hours on this material.
The quote on the right is from below. It is exactly spot on, in the “fog of war” I had already developed the declining exponential nature of viruses and herd immunity
MY EMAIL
Y’all probably don’t think of me as one of the top virologists, but I
actually am, now. This is a numbers game, and I am very good at numbers.
Read the charts, and this quick summary. Bottom line, the bullshit is
going to be seen through pretty soon, and states that don’t smart up and
open up within a week or two, are going to see violent protests.l
Note the first CHART…..all this hoopla, but in 22 of our states, as a
group, they are only averaging 2 deaths a day, Now. A week from now it
will be quite a bit less. Wow.
And CHART 2, in the next 20 largest states for deaths, in a week the
average will be around 5 per day per state.
See how this is rolling? Heads need to roll. And keep in mind the
last little blip, the last little peakiness was created by clear written
instruction to count almost every death as
COVID-19. “Death harvesting” Unprecedented.
Deep Dive on Death Data USA And Breakdowns By State Groups
stock here, it’s data collection time folks. I mean lie compilation time. Gather up the lies in real time and annotate them with the known facts. Showing the chronology and the lies and sources and establishing a coordinated effort to “make this as bad as it could be and appear to be”
Knowing what I know now, and reviewing what the CDC, NIH, WHO have said in the past, makes it 100% clear cut that they operated to inflict the most pain.
———————————————————————-
Note the first CHART…..all this hoopla, but in 22 of our states, as a group, they are only averaging 2 deaths a day, Now. A week from now it will be quite a bit less. Wow.
And CHART 2, in the next 20 largest states for deaths, in a week the average will be around 5 per day per state.
See how this is rolling? Heads need to roll. And keep in mind the last little blip, the last little peakiness was created by clear written instruction to count almost every death as COVID-19. Unprecedented.
They are pimping out a 5 year olds death in Detroit….2 memes…..racism against blacks “hurts them more”, and the very young are susceptible.
The smartest thing we could do now is send all schools and colleges back, let the restaurants and bars open and just advise older people to stay away. Young people who live with aging parents or grand parents, say over 70 for sure, should be allowed to not attend school, and shouldn’t be allowed to without a signed acknowledgement of warming from the old folks.
After I did the US analysis, I ran Italy also. There is a surprising result there, and I think it is because they have started to loosen up. They have a steady, almost linear decline in death, right after their peak, they did start exponentially going down on a .97, but then as they loosened up, the exponent went to 1…..a linear decline in deaths. They will likely avoid a second wave of any magnitude because “enough” people got it. I put that chart at the far bottom and on it’s own page.
……………….
Italy Data below, and repeating my comment above.
After I did the US analysis, I ran Italy also. There is a surprising result there, and I think it is because they have started to loosen up. They have a steady, almost linear decline in death, right after their peak, they did start exponentially going down on a .97, but then as they loosened up, the exponent went to 1…..a linear decline in deaths. They will likely avoid a second wave of any magnitude because “enough” people got it. I put that chart at the far bottom and on it’s own page.
The question of the day, is whether the statement below is a Axiom or a Hypothesis. Perhaps it can be called a Barnum Statement?
Fragile people assume that other people are also fragile. BOOM
You
what is the difference between a hypothesis, a theory, a theorem, and a postulate?ChatGPT
ChatGPT
These terms are often used in scientific and mathematical contexts, each with its own distinct meaning:
Hypothesis:
In science, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. It’s a testable statement that can be supported or refuted through experimentation or observation. Hypotheses are typically formulated based on prior knowledge, observations, or existing theories. They serve as the foundation for scientific inquiry and experimentation.
Example: “If plants receive more sunlight, they will grow taller.”
Theory:
In science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world. Unlike the common usage of “theory” as a guess or speculation, in science, a theory is a comprehensive explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence from multiple sources. Theories are the highest level of confidence in scientific understanding.
Example: The theory of evolution by natural selection provides a comprehensive explanation for the diversity of life on Earth and is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific disciplines.
Theorem:
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven to be true based on previously established axioms, definitions, and other theorems. Theorems are the backbone of mathematical proofs and are used to establish new mathematical results.
Example: The Pythagorean theorem states that in a right-angled triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides.
Postulate (or Axiom):
In mathematics, a postulate (also known as an axiom) is a statement that is accepted as true without proof. Postulates are fundamental assumptions upon which mathematical reasoning is based. They define the basic properties and relationships within a mathematical system.
Example: In Euclidean geometry, one of the postulates is that through any two points, there exists exactly one straight line.
In summary, a hypothesis is a testable statement in science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of natural phenomena, a theorem is a proven mathematical statement, and a postulate is an accepted fundamental assumption in mathematics.
You
are the postulate and axiom the exact same thing, and how would a barnum statement fit into thatChatGPT
ChatGPT
Yes, in mathematics, the terms “postulate” and “axiom” are often used interchangeably. Both refer to fundamental assumptions that are accepted as true without proof within a particular mathematical system. These assumptions serve as the starting point for mathematical reasoning and the development of theorems within that system.
As for a “Barnum statement,” it’s a term often used in psychology and related fields, referring to a statement that is general enough to apply to almost anyone and is often used in personality assessments or horoscopes. Barnum statements are designed to be vague and ambiguous, allowing individuals to interpret them in a way that seems personally meaningful.
In the context of the terms mentioned:
Barnum Statement:
This concept doesn’t directly relate to postulates, axioms, hypotheses, theories, or theorems in mathematics or science. Instead, it’s more closely associated with techniques used in psychology, personality assessments, and other fields where ambiguous statements are employed to create an illusion of specificity or accuracy.
Barnum statements are often used in personality assessments or horoscopes, where individuals might perceive them as highly accurate descriptions of themselves, even though the statements are intentionally vague and could apply to a wide range of people. They exploit the tendency of individuals to find personal relevance in statements that are sufficiently general or ambiguous.
You
Barnum statements are also used in legal proceedings in which one party presents information as if “obviously true” when in fact it is not, but they are hoping that someone accepts it as fact. In your statement above, compare that to “cold reading” a person.ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Certainly. “Cold reading” is a technique often used by mentalists, psychics, and some therapists to give the impression of psychic ability or insight into a person’s thoughts and feelings. It involves making generalized statements or observations that could apply to many people and then using the individual’s responses and body language to refine those statements, making them seem more specific and accurate.
In comparison to Barnum statements, cold reading involves directly interacting with an individual, often in a one-on-one setting. The practitioner may use various techniques such as asking leading questions, making educated guesses based on visual cues, or using vague statements that could apply to a wide range of people. As the interaction progresses, the reader adjusts their statements based on the individual’s reactions, leading them to believe that the reader has unique insight into their personality or situation.
While Barnum statements are more generally applicable and can be used in broader contexts such as legal proceedings or personality assessments, cold reading is a specific technique used in interpersonal interactions to create the illusion of deep insight or understanding. Both techniques rely on exploiting human tendencies to perceive vague or generalized statements as personally meaningful or accurate.
You
ok now just focus on this part User Barnum statements are also used in legal proceedings in which one party presents information as if “obviously true” when in fact it is not, but they are hoping that someone accepts it as fact. ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Certainly. In legal proceedings, Barnum statements can be used strategically by one party to present information that appears self-evident or unquestionably true, even if it lacks substantial evidence or validity. By framing the statement in a way that seems inherently believable or logical, the party may attempt to influence the perception of the judge, jury, or other parties involved.
For example, a lawyer might make a Barnum statement during opening arguments, suggesting a narrative or interpretation of events that seems intuitive or common sense, even if it’s not supported by concrete evidence. By presenting this statement as if it were obviously true, the lawyer aims to shape the initial impression of the case and potentially sway the opinions of those hearing the argument.
In essence, Barnum statements in legal proceedings are a form of persuasion tactic, leveraging the human tendency to accept information that aligns with preconceived notions or appears intuitively believable, even if it lacks substantive proof. The goal is to influence perceptions and potentially gain an advantage in the legal process.
You
so they would be attempting to present something as prime fascia evidence, even though it may not beChatGPT
ChatGPT
Exactly. By presenting something as prima facie evidence, a party in a legal proceeding is attempting to make it appear self-evident or obvious on its face, without the need for further investigation or analysis. This tactic can be used to influence the perceptions of judges, juries, or other parties involved in the case, potentially shaping the direction of the proceedings in their favor.
However, it’s important to recognize that prima facie evidence may not always be as conclusive or reliable as it initially appears. It’s essential for the opposing party and the legal system as a whole to critically evaluate the evidence presented and assess its validity, ensuring that decisions are based on a thorough examination of all relevant facts and arguments.